I updated the gist posting. All of the macros should be functional now
and have cleaned up describe blocks.
http://gist.github.com/14050
Andy Freeman wrote:
> It is a bit ugly but here is an initial port of the Shoulda ActiveRecord
> macros:
>
> http://gist.github.com/14050
>
It is a bit ugly but here is an initial port of the Shoulda ActiveRecord
macros:
http://gist.github.com/14050
I did not try running ALL of the macros, but most of them. Before going
too far with it, I would appreciate some recommendations as to how to
improve the flow. The Shoulda version ha
I was actually teasing... :)
As far as writing one... already on it!
David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Andy Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a variation on that with a helper for defining macros that I'm
>
AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Are you willing to provide a simple example?
>>>
>>> I'm using the same example as the articled you linked to ori
Are you willing to provide a simple example?
Andy
Matt Wynne wrote:
> We do something similar to this, though we use a convention to set
> @klass to the class being spec'd in the top-level example group,
> rather than deriving it as they do in that sample.
>
> In view specs we also use a convent
I just stumbled upon this link this morning where Shoulda makes it easy
to automatically load custom macros. Is there a similar feature in
RSpec?
http://technicalpickles.com/posts/shoulda-can-automatically-load-custom-macros
Andy
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
