RSpec is a tool, it should be in face *minimally* (yes, this is important!)
A job description that mentioned RSpec explicitly would signal a red flag
to me.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Ashley Moran <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Bryan Liles wrote:
> When trying to configure a rspec 1.1.2 based app in CC.rb, I came
> across the following:
>
> .
>
> I had a solution that would monkey patch over this, but now I'm
> looking for some help in actually explaining why
When trying to configure a rspec 1.1.2 based app in CC.rb, I came
across the following:
/home/bryan/cruisecontrolrb-1.2.1/projects/support-engines/work/vendor/
plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/../../../../rspec/lib/spec/
runner/options.rb:218:in `files_to_load': File or directory not foun
On Jan 8, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Matt Patterson wrote:
>
>
> When you invoke rake to do something, say check_manifest
>
>
>> rake check_manifest
>>
>
> You wind up with a Runtime error, as follows:
>
>
>> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.1/lib/spec/runner/
>> options.rb:216:in `files_to_loa
On Dec 31, 2007, at 9:22 PM, Chiyuan Zhang wrote:
> Hmm, Thanks for your suggestion. I suppose the document of stories
> for rspec is not complete yet? Maybe the file layout suggestion could
> be included in the document.
>
> ps: Happy New Year to all!
Stories are still a moving target. I was s
On Dec 31, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Chiyuan Zhang wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have a story steps array.rb and the story array.story. I
> can run it with
>
> ruby array.rb
>
> But when I execute
>
> spec array.rb
>
> nothing happened. I'm wondering how can I use spec command to
> execute stories? (executin
I've been thinking about the structure of the rspec story stuff, and
I've come up with this for my first post:
stories/ # top level to contain all of our story related stuff
stories/helper.rb # top level helper
stories/helpers/ # other helpers like custom matchers and other libs
stories/st
On Nov 29, 2007, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Tenner wrote:
> What are people's opinions on which of these two styles is better to
> use?
>
>
> it "should be possible to disable the number" do
> given(valid_sms_user) do |user|
> user.save
> user.disable_number
> user.should be_disab
I wrote some quick notes up on a custom matcher I wrote around a
pattern that I am using constantly.
http://smartic.us/2007/11/26/rspec-matcher-for-active-record-associations
You could use it as a custom matcher tutorial for the uninitiated or
as a possible solution for validations specs for
http://tinyurl.com/2bolrs
I'm working on a series of screencasts on RSpec and BDD. This first
iteration is on the real basics.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 21:43 -0400, Andrew WC Brown wrote:
> I'm going through PeepCode RSpec Basics and he gets a beautiful rspec
> results page in html when he presses a hotkey in TextMate.
> I would guess it's along the lines of Apple + R but I don't get the
> same results and I'm using the same
On Sep 10, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Bryan Liles wrote:
>
> These patches are in trunk already?
>
Yes they are.
r2544 | dchelimsky | 2007-09-08 17:43:01 -0400 (Sat, 08 Sep 2007) | 1
line
reworked textmate bundle shor
On Sep 8, 2007, at 5:59 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hi all, I got some help from James Edward Gray II on the RSpec
> TextMate bundle. For those of you who don't know James, he runs the
> Ruby Quiz and also maintains the official TM bundle.
>
> Per a couple of patches from him and some advice tha
On Sep 5, 2007, at 7:05 PM, Tor Norbye wrote:
>
> The problem is that when I'm looking at a spec file, there are no
> require-statements. Obviously, the methods I see called in the spec
> files must be defined by the test runner itself before running the
> spec file.
>
> Can somebody enlighten me
14 matches
Mail list logo
