st have to write an
integration test with fixtures, sending the data and then testing
results.
Any ideas other than find a java testing tool, because I just try to
avoid java but can't since it is how I have to pay the bills. :(
Thanks,
GregD
___
wrong. And I'm not sure this is
desirable if the test fails. Any ideas on this other than to replace
the java with ruby or have the java not to dump to stdout? ;-) Both
of which, I can not do. But, I can live with the nastiness of this,
if there is no possible way around it.
Than
ollowing this convention you will only have to specify the spec on
> the command line.
>
Duh! Thanks. Brain fart on my part. I went and looked back at my
rails apps and yes I missed that for these specs.
Works like a charm. Sorry for being stupid.
GregD
_
know I
can use rake and create a rake task(s), but from the perspective of
the command line, it would be nice to not to have to supply the -r
option unless you want to include something "outside" of this
convention.
Regards,
GregD
___
rspec-use
to be included?
Thanks,
GregD (newbie)
On Sep 26, 6:37 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:29 PM, GregD wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > Newbie here and I'm using rspec with jruby to test a java class, but
> > this is more of a
should contain the key #{var1}" { should satisify{|a|
a.contains_key?(var1)
} }
But, the loading complains on that. Where can a put a custom
description into
this code (easily/polite way).
Thanks,
GregD
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
use those seeds
to fine
tune specific tests.
Thanks,
GregD
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
