On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Jim Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Muhammad Ichsan wrote:
>
> Check out this thread:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rspec/browse_thread/thread/7bb484873d327232/a2d46045dcbf1066?lnk=st&q=Should(not%3F)+tes
Dear All,
Before I know spec'ing, I've been practicing testing using JUnit. I
remember that once Kent Beck said (if I'm not mistaken) that we should
not test exhaustively. Instead, we should test until our doubt in the
quality is gone. What about spec'ing? Is spec'ing aimed to create good
document
Dear All,
I'm a new member here. I've been using RSpec since my first Rails
project. I'm proud that I've deliver the most bugs free app in my
office (In my country, spec'ing even autotesting is not common).
Thanks to Ruby community that make autotesting very easy and
encouraging. I think Ruby is t
