the string with the options
that should be passed onto heckle? The idea is that it should simply be
passed on. I'm probably missing something... ;)
/Robert
Scott
>
>
>
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org
the lines of:
spec --heckle --options-heckle "--verbose --branches
MyModule::MyClass#my_method" ...
and the argument to --options-heckle (or --options-rcov etc) would simply be
passed along in the call to heckle. This would cover more situations with a
single so
psyched about 'specify' either. There IS a
perfect word for this situation. What is it? Suggestions?
I like "should" or "spec" the best.
While I'm at it why not "given" instead of "describe"?
Cheers,
Robert Feldt
_
On 7/12/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/12/07, Robert Feldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying out RSpec with the heckle option (for mutation testing).
>
>
> Problem is that heckle goes into an infinite loop when running i
On 7/12/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/12/07, Robert Feldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying out RSpec with the heckle option (for mutation testing).
>
>
> Problem is that heckle goes into an infinite loop when running i
ommon situation when
using heckle I would like this to be supported in some way by RSpec.
Thoughts?
Best regards,
/Robert Feldt
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
