On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
> Actually, now that I think about it, Spork claims the Kernel#debugger
> method before Rspec checks if it should install it's catch, so it might be
> fine.
>
> Still, I would prefer if if the above "require 'ruby-
I'm not exactly sure what the motivation behind the "debugger" catch was,
perhaps a convenience method to allow your code to remain littered with
debugger statements? At any rate, it's obstructed my normal use of
ruby-debug, and regardless of whether I've passed the -d or --debug flag, it
still com
Actually, now that I think about it, Spork claims the Kernel#debugger method
before Rspec checks if it should install it's catch, so it might be fine.
Still, I would prefer if if the above "require 'ruby-debug'; debugger"
convention still worked.
Tim
On Mon, May 3, 201
Hi Dave,
Have you voted for spork-windows support? It's getting closer, but
issues will be tackled in the order of most votes.
http://github.com/timcharper/spork/issues#issue/3
Tim
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dave Nolan wrote:
> On recent versions of RSpec/RSpec rails, if you are using
>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, nbenes wrote:
>
>
>
> Tim Harper wrote:
> >
> >> Have you heard of anyone that has rspec/spork/cucumber etc running under
> >> cygwin, colinux, andLinux, or Ulteo Virtual Desktop. Do any of them
> >> allo
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Tom Hoen wrote:
> I tried to vote a +1, but get this after clicking the Comment button:
>
> There was a problem serving the requested page.
>
> Now you're wondering, "what can I do about it!?!". Well...
That's lame. votes have been coming in on other issue
There is no voting love on the windows feature request:
http://github.com/timcharper/spork/issues
:)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Tom Hoen wrote:
> David - Thank you for responding.
>
>
>
> >
> > Previously to what? What changed?
> >
>
>
> The only changes were some additional models/contro
Shipman wrote:
> On 16 Jun 2009, at 22:11, Tim Harper wrote:
>
> I'm interested to hear your experience with Spork and Merb. Right now
>> Spork is doing some hooks in to rails (that are actually kind of aggressive
>> right now) to help make spork work more out of th
I'm interested to hear your experience with Spork and Merb. Right now Spork
is doing some hooks in to rails (that are actually kind of aggressive right
now) to help make spork work more out of the box - specifically, preventing
rails from preloading application models and controllers before the fo
Ben J.,
Have you given up on this? You're right - that defeats the purpose of
Spork. You need to make sure that any code that loads code in your project
does not make it in to your Spork.prefork block. If you are specifically
loading the models in your environment, that's your problem.
Here's so
$1
> else
>@name = name
> end
> end
>
> def visit_exception(exception, status)
> exception_file = "#{File.dirname(__FILE__)}/#...@name}.html"
> open(exception_file, 'w') { |f| f << browser.html }
> end
> end
>
> Aidy
>
>
Is currently a way to add a upon failure hook? I'd like to make it so that,
in the event of a failed assertion, Webrat will take the last requested page
and open it in a browser.
Thanks :)
Tim
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http:
I released 1.1.5 yesterday, including rspec-1.1.5 and rspec-
rails-1.1.5 gems.
It works fantastic. Thanks for a quality release. I've freed up
about 100 of megs on my hard drive already.
Cheers,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-user
Hey Tim,
I actually added a 'gem' task to the rspec-rails project a while
ago..
It was soon deprecated in favor of using Hoe however. Either way
though
rspec-rails on github allows you to build the gem yourself using rake
and install it locally. I think the reason for not making it an
offic
I was getting a little tired of adding 2 plugins every time I create a
new rails project, so I just built an rspec-rails gemspec, and it
works perfectly well. Does anybody know why there isn't a public
rspec-rails gem?
Tim
___
rspec-users mailing
Created:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/365-feature-rspec-bundle-update-rspec-bundle
Thanks everyone!
Tim
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi,
I forked the rspec bundle on github and added a new command to it (an
Update RSpec Bundle command). I sent a pull request, but haven't
heard back from anyone on it.
David, did you get my pull request? Or did it get lost in the black
whole of cyberspace? (if you were too busy to respon
Well there we go, Ben's method still stands :)
Tim
On Jan 8, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> Yes. http://eigenclass.org/hiki/Changes+in+Ruby+1.9#l24
>
> Tim Harper wrote:
>> Doesn't 1.9 allow you to call obj.send!, which will allow you to
>> access priv
Doesn't 1.9 allow you to call obj.send!, which will allow you to
access private methods?
Tim
On Jan 8, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
>> Chris Olsen wrote:
>>> How does a person test private methods?
>>>
>>> Is there a way to declare t
All,
I've found that the html view for the rspec formatter falls to pieces with
Rails 2.02 and rspec 1.10. Has anyone else run into this trouble?
Here's a monkey patch that fixes the problem. A more elegant fix would be
in order, but this gets the job done:
Index:
/Users/timcharper/www/exchang
Quick announcement:
I wrote a small enhancement to TestUnitRunner.rb to allow RadRails to run
both Test::Unit cases and RSpec examples in the fancy pants GUI runner.
Chris will be merging it in with future releases of RadRails, and we're
going to work on getting the integration better (some limit
21 matches
Mail list logo
