David Chelimsky-2 wrote:
>
> That is by design. RSpec is about spec'ing things in isolation,
> whereas cucumber is about spec'ing things end to end. RSpec controller
> specs are about *controllers*, not views, so the presence and/or
> validity of a view should not impact the controller spec.
>
I've got this test:
describe LoginController do
describe "GET index" do
it "should be successful" do
get 'index'
response.should be_success
end
end
end
which passes, but a cucumber test fails on trying to get the index for
LoginController, with the message:
No action r
to logged in users, log out in a different
window, then submit the form in the original window. is this possible, and
should it be in cucumber that I am testing this, or is it a lower-level
test?
Thanks,
mBread
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Asynchronous-requests-%28effec
I am wanting to specify "Then I should not see a "New item" link" in a
cucumber scenario. Is it possible to use Webrat::Locators.find_link (as used
in click_link) in a cucumber step definition? Or is there some reason why I
shouldn't assert the absence of a link? I could just use
response.should_
