Re: [rspec-users] 'And' step definition

2008-12-06 Thread James Byrne
Mark Wilden wrote: > Thanks for your replies, David and James. I figured as much, actually, > since > you wouldn't want to have some And steps in your definition file and > some > Given steps. > > I was led astray by "Inside a step_definitions.rb file, steps (which > strictly speaking should alw

Re: [rspec-users] 'And' step definition

2008-12-05 Thread Mark Wilden
Thanks for your replies, David and James. I figured as much, actually, since you wouldn't want to have some And steps in your definition file and some Given steps. I was led astray by "Inside a step_definitions.rb file, steps (which strictly speaking should always be called step definitions) refer

Re: [rspec-users] 'And' step definition

2008-12-05 Thread James Byrne
Mark Wilden wrote: > Can you have an And step in a feature? With this, I get a NoMethodError > for > 'And': > > Given /a company named (.+)/ do |name| > @company = Company.create!(:name => name) > end > > And /a user named (.+)/ do |name| > @user = create_user name > end > > I'm probably mi

Re: [rspec-users] 'And' step definition

2008-12-05 Thread David Chelimsky
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you have an And step in a feature? With this, I get a NoMethodError for > 'And': > > Given /a company named (.+)/ do |name| > @company = Company.create!(:name => name) > end > > And /a user named (.+)/ do |name| > @use

[rspec-users] 'And' step definition

2008-12-05 Thread Mark Wilden
Can you have an And step in a feature? With this, I get a NoMethodError for 'And': Given /a company named (.+)/ do |name| @company = Company.create!(:name => name) end And /a user named (.+)/ do |name| @user = create_user name end I'm probably missing something really obvious. ///ark __