On 3 Apr 2008, at 15:58, Kyle Hargraves wrote:
> This is very tied to the layout of my own projects, and I'd be
> surprised if it works out of the box for most people. Right now it
> does mostly everything I need, so I'm curious what would be necessary
> to make it a viable tool for others to use
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Kamal Fariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>
> I tried the story runner against a story. Unfortunately, it had
> problems executing webrat methods like 'visits'.
>
> Kindly check out this pastie: http://pastie.org/175204
>
> I tried running it with the nor
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Joe Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hullo all,
> >
> > It sucks to write wrapper .rb files just so stories/all.rb can find
> > and run them.
>
> Here's what my stories/all.rb lo
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hullo all,
>
> It sucks to write wrapper .rb files just so stories/all.rb can find
> and run them.
Here's what my stories/all.rb looks like:
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/helper'
Dir[File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../s
Hi Kyle,
I tried the story runner against a story. Unfortunately, it had
problems executing webrat methods like 'visits'.
Kindly check out this pastie: http://pastie.org/175204
I tried running it with the normal ruby wrapper and it works fine.
Regards,
Kamal
_
> It sucks to write wrapper .rb files just so stories/all.rb can find
> and run them.
Very nice. I was considering moving over to the Rubyesque stories so
that I don't have to have .story files around and the wrapper like you
mentioned. The wrapper is the story.
http://continuousthinking.com/
Hullo all,
It sucks to write wrapper .rb files just so stories/all.rb can find
and run them.
So I am trawling for feedback on a small project I pushed to github a
day or two ago; it provides a 'story' executable that can be used to
run your plain text stories from the command line, akin to the 's
