On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why ask us when you can ask rubygems?
>>
> Well I prefer to ask (and sound stupid 5 minutes) than not ask (and be
> stupid all my life), that's the way I work. From the cucumber github
> wiki located at: http://github.com
I have removed the plugins for both cucumber and webrat. Now I am having
the following error message when running rake features or
./script/generate cucumber:
--
/usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.1.6/lib/cucumber/cli.rb:83:in
`read': No such file or directory - cucumber.yml (Errn
> Why ask us when you can ask rubygems?
>
Well I prefer to ask (and sound stupid 5 minutes) than not ask (and be
stupid all my life), that's the way I work. From the cucumber github
wiki located at: http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis
--
Installation
(Rails people – see Ruby on Rails
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Going plugin-less for RSpec went 99% smoothly, here is the only error
> message I got:
>
> $ ./script/generate rspec
> Gem::SourceIndex#search support for Regexp patterns is deprecated
> /usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/ge
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way for a RoR application, can I also go plugin-less for Webrat
> and Cucumber? From what I understand I still need to install these two
> as plugins.
Why ask us when you can ask rubygems?
$ gem q -drn cucumber
$
By the way for a RoR application, can I also go plugin-less for Webrat
and Cucumber? From what I understand I still need to install these two
as plugins.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
h
Hi,
Going plugin-less for RSpec went 99% smoothly, here is the only error
message I got:
$ ./script/generate rspec
Gem::SourceIndex#search support for Regexp patterns is deprecated
/usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.1/lib/rails_generator/lookup.rb:211:in
`each' is outdated
--
Po
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:41 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Also - the script files prepend vendor/plugins/rspec/lib to the path,
>> but if they are not there, there shouldn't be a problem. That jus
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:41 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>
> Also - the script files prepend vendor/plugins/rspec/lib to the path,
> but if they are not there, there shouldn't be a problem. That just
> ensures that if you DO have the plugin installed it takes precedence
> ov
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:38 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:58 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:58 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> How do you go plugin-less for RSpec? The plugins require you to gener
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:58 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How do you go plugin-less for RSpec? The plugins require you to generate
>> some files, so how do you do that without a plugin? Is there still a
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool.
>
> However what happens when my app is currently using the plugin version,
> is it easy to migrate to the gem? Should I regenerate the files? I guess
> there is somewhere a line that says to rspec "look into vendor/
Cool.
However what happens when my app is currently using the plugin version,
is it easy to migrate to the gem? Should I regenerate the files? I guess
there is somewhere a line that says to rspec "look into vendor/plugins"?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you go plugin-less for RSpec? The plugins require you to generate
> some files, so how do you do that without a plugin? Is there still a
> rake task in the gem to generate the required files?
I'll post this up on t
How do you go plugin-less for RSpec? The plugins require you to generate
some files, so how do you do that without a plugin? Is there still a
rake task in the gem to generate the required files?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users
"Zach Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Donald French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can someone tell me the difference ins the gem versions and the plugin
>> versions? do they work together? need both?
>>
>
> You do not need both. The plugin versions are for Rub
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Donald French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference ins the gem versions and the plugin
> versions? do they work together? need both?
>
You do not need both. The plugin versions are for Ruby on Rails
projects. Rails had a way of loading plu
Can someone tell me the difference ins the gem versions and the plugin
versions? do they work together? need both?
Don French
On Oct 3, 2008, at 3:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send rspec-users mailing list submissions to
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via th
19 matches
Mail list logo
