On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Erik Pukinskis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Erik Pukinskis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> * a matcher that accepts a block and passes on some information, like
>>> has_tag?
>>> * a matc
Hey Pat,
Thanks for your response! Even if it's just to say RTFC. :) I have
been digging into the source regularly. It's a bit too complicated
for me to understand right now, and I find often the way core matchers
are written is appropriate for code that is going to be distributed
with RSpec,
"Erik Pukinskis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * a matcher that accepts a block and passes on some information, like has_tag?
> * a matcher that can go in that block and use that information, like with_tag?
> * a mock argument matcher like is_instance_of or hash_including?
>
> It'd be wonderful if
Hi Folks!
For any developers reading... thank you for RSpec... it's wonderful!
I've been trying my darndest to get into it, spec everything ahead of
time, and it's working out great.
The one thing I really have a hard time with though is writing more
advanced custom matchers. I can write simple
