Re: [rspec-users] New rescue_from handling in rspec-rails 1.1.12

2009-01-15 Thread Chris Kampmeier
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:30 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Chris Kampmeier > wrote: > > > (Or, here's a syntax-highlighted pastie: http://pastie.org/361114) > > Don't forget that the spec should come first :) Also, you're spec'ing > behaviour, not implementation. S

Re: [rspec-users] New rescue_from handling in rspec-rails 1.1.12

2009-01-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Chris Kampmeier wrote: > Howdy, > > This change to rspec-rails in 1.1.12 tripped me up: > http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec-rails/commit/ef6d2fc15a > (or, see the relevant Lighthouse ticket, here: > http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/85) > > Basi

[rspec-users] New rescue_from handling in rspec-rails 1.1.12

2009-01-14 Thread Chris Kampmeier
Howdy, This change to rspec-rails in 1.1.12 tripped me up: http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec-rails/commit/ef6d2fc15a (or, see the relevant Lighthouse ticket, here: http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/85) Basically, we were depending on that "bug" in 1.1.11, since it seemed to ma