Re: [rspec-users] Newbie question Context vs Describe

2008-02-26 Thread Pat Maddox
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:26 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In terms of getting that into RSpec, why don't you enter a feature > request at http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com and we can discuss the > merits of this there. As I said, I like it at first glance, but I want > to think

Re: [rspec-users] Newbie question Context vs Describe

2008-02-24 Thread Joe Ocampo
>At first glance, that is really cool. We've also batted around some >other names like #facet or #behavior. LOL..I smile because we went through the same semantic struggles as well. The funny thing is the rSpec project led us to our resolve. :-) We basically came to this conclusion every object

Re: [rspec-users] Newbie question Context vs Describe

2008-02-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Joe Ocampo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Background just started programming in Ruby literally 12 hours ago and have > a question regarding context and describe methods. Reading the RDoc it > indicated that "context" is an alias for "describe". So I decided to try

[rspec-users] Newbie question Context vs Describe

2008-02-24 Thread Joe Ocampo
Background just started programming in Ruby literally 12 hours ago and have a question regarding context and describe methods. Reading the RDoc it indicated that "context" is an alias for "describe". So I decided to try to the following syntax seeing this is how I would approach it in C# with NB