Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-28 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 28, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Julien wrote: > On Jun 27, 5:39 am, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2010, at 10:38 PM, geetarista wrote: >> What I believe to be the fix is now up in github. Geetarista, would you do me a favor and update your gemfile to point to the git repos: >> >>

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-28 Thread Julien
Thank you all for this discussion and the fix I ran into the same issue this morning, but with "Factory" being the class that was undefined (using Factory Girl) The fix explained in this discussion worked for me. As a reminder for others : 1 - update spec_helper require File.expand_path("../..

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-26 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 26, 2010, at 10:38 PM, geetarista wrote: >> What I believe to be the fix is now up in github. Geetarista, would you do >> me a favor and update your gemfile to point to the git repos: >> >> gem "rspec-rails", :git => "git://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails.git" >> gem "rspec-core", :git => "gi

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-26 Thread geetarista
That fixed it. Thanks so much, David! > What I believe to be the fix is now up in github. Geetarista, would you do me > a favor and update your gemfile to point to the git repos: > > gem "rspec-rails", :git => "git://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails.git" > gem "rspec-core", :git => "git://github.com

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-26 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jun 25, 2010, at 4:51 PM, geetarista wrote: > >> Sorry about that. For some reason I thought Google Reader stripped >> that automatically. >> >> I added ":require => nil" because I had read somewhere that it was >> good to do so. Can't

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-26 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 25, 2010, at 4:51 PM, geetarista wrote: > Sorry about that. For some reason I thought Google Reader stripped > that automatically. > > I added ":require => nil" because I had read somewhere that it was > good to do so. Can't remember why or where. Taking it out does not > fix the failure

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-26 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 25, 2010, at 4:51 PM, geetarista wrote: > Sorry about that. For some reason I thought Google Reader stripped > that automatically. > > I added ":require => nil" because I had read somewhere that it was > good to do so. Can't remember why or where. Taking it out does not > fix the failure

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-25 Thread geetarista
Sorry about that. For some reason I thought Google Reader stripped that automatically. I added ":require => nil" because I had read somewhere that it was good to do so. Can't remember why or where. Taking it out does not fix the failure. I just haven't upgraded Haml because it's not top priorit

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-25 Thread Wincent Colaiuta
El 25/06/2010, a las 17:44, geetarista escribió: > Gemfile: http://gist.github.com/453032 > > On Jun 25, 7:41 am, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: >> El 25/06/2010, a las 15:38, geetarista escribió: >> >>> That did not fix it. >> >> What have you got in your Gemfile? (Aside: please don't top-post; it

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-25 Thread geetarista
Gemfile: http://gist.github.com/453032 On Jun 25, 7:41 am, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > El 25/06/2010, a las 15:38, geetarista escribió: > > > That did not fix it. > > What have you got in your Gemfile? > > Cheers, > Wincent > > ___ > rspec-users mailing l

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-25 Thread Wincent Colaiuta
El 25/06/2010, a las 15:38, geetarista escribió: > That did not fix it. What have you got in your Gemfile? Cheers, Wincent ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-25 Thread geetarista
That did not fix it. On Jun 25, 3:41 am, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jun 24, 2010, at 11:05 PM, geetarista wrote: > > >http://gist.github.com/452385 > > > (It's the default generated from rails g rspec:install). > > > I'm not sure what else it could be.  I literally change my Gemfile > > from bet

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-25 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 24, 2010, at 11:05 PM, geetarista wrote: > http://gist.github.com/452385 > > (It's the default generated from rails g rspec:install). > > I'm not sure what else it could be. I literally change my Gemfile > from beta.12 (where specs work) to beta.13 run 'bundle install/update' > and it t

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread geetarista
http://gist.github.com/452385 (It's the default generated from rails g rspec:install). I'm not sure what else it could be. I literally change my Gemfile from beta.12 (where specs work) to beta.13 run 'bundle install/update' and it then fails. On Jun 24, 8:49 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jun

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:36 PM, geetarista wrote: > On Jun 24, 8:21 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:12 PM, geetarista wrote: >> >>> On Jun 24, 7:10 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:24 PM, geetarista wrote: >> > On Jun 24, 12:03 pm, David Chelims

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread geetarista
Here's the backtrace and the spec file: http://gist.github.com/452355 Also, if I delete that spec file, it just goes to the next alphabetical file and gives the same error for that model name. On Jun 24, 8:21 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:12 PM, geetarista wrote: > > >

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:12 PM, geetarista wrote: > > On Jun 24, 7:10 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:24 PM, geetarista wrote: >> >> > On Jun 24, 12:03 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: >> >> On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, geetarista wrote: >> >> >>> I just upgraded to beta.13 and I

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread geetarista
I'm using Rails master. On Jun 24, 7:10 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:24 PM, geetarista wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 12:03 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, geetarista wrote: > > >>> I just upgraded to beta.13 and I'm running into an issue where when I

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:24 PM, geetarista wrote: > On Jun 24, 12:03 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, geetarista wrote: >> >>> I just upgraded to beta.13 and I'm running into an issue where when I >>> run 'rake spec', I get an 'uninitialized constant Comment' error. >>> Co

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread geetarista
I did both 'bundle install' and 'bundle update'. On Jun 24, 12:03 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, geetarista wrote: > > > I just upgraded to beta.13 and I'm running into an issue where when I > > run 'rake spec', I get an 'uninitialized constant Comment' error. > > Comme

Re: [rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, geetarista wrote: > I just upgraded to beta.13 and I'm running into an issue where when I > run 'rake spec', I get an 'uninitialized constant Comment' error. > Comment is the first model (alphabetically) in my project. If I > switch back to beta.12, it works. If I us

[rspec-users] Rake spec failure in beta.13

2010-06-24 Thread geetarista
I just upgraded to beta.13 and I'm running into an issue where when I run 'rake spec', I get an 'uninitialized constant Comment' error. Comment is the first model (alphabetically) in my project. If I switch back to beta.12, it works. If I use 'spec .' and not 'rake spec', it also works. Environm