The Stories (ie Story Runner full integration tests that hit the db)
are fairly slow by comparison, I agree. We have those run on our CI
server, and only locally when we modify them. That's our approach
for handling integration testing.
Re: The mac mini's, yeah they were pairing stations
On Oct 7, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
>>
>> The factory method (or attribute_helper) still hits the database. I
>> don't see it as any sort of performance gain. In fact, I've even
>> developed a plugin around the Factory idea, and it was only when I
>> started using it in all of my test
>
> The factory method (or attribute_helper) still hits the database. I
> don't see it as any sort of performance gain. In fact, I've even
> developed a plugin around the Factory idea, and it was only when I
> started using it in all of my tests that the speed really started to
> affect m
On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On 10/6/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2007, at 1:47 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/6/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Chad Humphries wrote:
> Scott,
>
On 10/6/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 1:47 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
> > On 10/6/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Chad Humphries wrote:
> >>
> >>> Scott,
> >>>
> >>> I don't really have a lot to contribute on how t
On Oct 7, 2007, at 1:47 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On 10/6/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Chad Humphries wrote:
>>
>>> Scott,
>>>
>>> I don't really have a lot to contribute on how to make it faster,
>>> other than to outline what we've been doing on o
On 10/6/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Chad Humphries wrote:
>
> > Scott,
> >
> > I don't really have a lot to contribute on how to make it faster,
> > other than to outline what we've been doing on our projects.
> >
> > On one of our current projects w
On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Chad Humphries wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I don't really have a lot to contribute on how to make it faster,
> other than to outline what we've been doing on our projects.
>
> On one of our current projects we have the following 2570 examples
> that run in ~70 seconds on our
Scott,
I don't really have a lot to contribute on how to make it faster,
other than to outline what we've been doing on our projects.
On one of our current projects we have the following 2570 examples
that run in ~70 seconds on our pairing stations (mac minis, 1.83
c2d). In general across
On Oct 4, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Jerry West wrote:
> In-memory with sqlite worked fine with rspec-0.8 (it's been a while
> since I did this!). Google for instructions or drop me a line. Don't
> forget autotest/zentest to run only those tests which have ben
> affected
> by changes.
Actually, on m
On Oct 4, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Jerry West wrote:
> In-memory with sqlite worked fine with rspec-0.8 (it's been a while
> since I did this!). Google for instructions or drop me a line. Don't
> forget autotest/zentest to run only those tests which have ben
> affected
> by changes.
Actually, on m
In-memory with sqlite worked fine with rspec-0.8 (it's been a while
since I did this!). Google for instructions or drop me a line. Don't
forget autotest/zentest to run only those tests which have ben affected
by changes.
Rgds,
Jerry
Scott Taylor wrote:
> Just wanted to pick some smart peop
Scott Taylor wrote:
>> If your test suite and application are fully open source and you don't
>> mind someone playing with it, I'm collecting benchmark suites for the
>> Ruby interpreter and would love to have a nice heavy "rspec" run as an
>> example of real-world Ruby usage. Contact me off-list i
>
> If your test suite and application are fully open source and you don't
> mind someone playing with it, I'm collecting benchmark suites for the
> Ruby interpreter and would love to have a nice heavy "rspec" run as an
> example of real-world Ruby usage. Contact me off-list if you're
> interested,
Scott Taylor wrote:
> Just wanted to pick some smart people about this topic: What are you
> guys doing to increase the speed of your specs?
>
> I'm a big fan of autotest, but right now my current project has 438
> specs (for rails). Most of them are in the model, and for all of
> them we a
Just wanted to pick some smart people about this topic: What are you
guys doing to increase the speed of your specs?
I'm a big fan of autotest, but right now my current project has 438
specs (for rails). Most of them are in the model, and for all of
them we are hitting the database (they a
16 matches
Mail list logo
