Thank you so much Stephen.
I am ruby and rails beginner (created a simple site so far) that
decided to
dive into rspec and I feel the pains you described.
I decided to start new rails app and do it with rspec (and to only
test my models).
Is there a github project with rspec code that test the m
Thank you so much Stephen.
I am ruby and rails beginner (created a simple site so far) that
decided to
dive into rspec and I feel the pains you described.
I decided to start new rails app and do it with rspec (and to only
test my models).
is there a github project with rspec code that test the mo
Thank you so much Stephen.
I am ruby and rails beginner (created a simple site so far) that
decided to
dive into rspec and I feel the pains you described.
I decided to start new rails app and do it with rspec (and to only
test my models).
Is there a github project with rspec code that test the m
test
On Jun 12, 9:41 am, Stephen Eley wrote:
> Ben and Rick,
>
> Thanks very much to both of you for the encouraging responses. Your
> reply, Ben, came just in time as I was starting to wonder if I had
> made a complete and irrevocable ass of myself.
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Ben Mab
Thanks for the encouragement, Ben. :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>> Then /^I should find "(.+)" in JSON/ do |xpath|
>> json_hash = JSON.parse(@response.body.gsub(/^#{JSON_CALLBACK}\((.*)\)/,
>> '\1'))
>> xmldoc = Nokogiri::XML(json_hash.to_xml)
>> xpath.gsub!('_', '-'
Bill Kocik wrote:
Just to add a couple cents in...
I've been working as either a sysadmin or software developer for the
last 10 years (software development pretty much exclusively for the
last 5 or 6). I started picking up Rails about 2 years ago, and though
I was always aware of TDD - and even
Just to add a couple cents in...
I've been working as either a sysadmin or software developer for the
last 10 years (software development pretty much exclusively for the
last 5 or 6). I started picking up Rails about 2 years ago, and though
I was always aware of TDD - and even occasionally dabbled
I read this whole thread with interest (alerted by a cross-post on the
railsbridge list, thx Zach). Thanks Stephen for kicking off this
interesting discussion:
> Given time, I think the patterns facilitated by RSpec could
> *completely* revolutionize the way software happens everywhere, *if
Stephen Eley wrote:
Ben and Rick,
Thanks very much to both of you for the encouraging responses. Your
reply, Ben, came just in time as I was starting to wonder if I had
made a complete and irrevocable ass of myself.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
In general though I do
Ben and Rick,
Thanks very much to both of you for the encouraging responses. Your
reply, Ben, came just in time as I was starting to wonder if I had
made a complete and irrevocable ass of myself.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> In general though I don't know if I
> really s
I'm rambling now, and I've spent *way* too much of my workday on this
message, so I'll just summarize:
* Some easy things are complicated in RSpec;
* Incomplete understanding of RSpec and a framework being spec'ed can
create learning deadlock;
* Novices need different answers than competent pra
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> So... In the recent five-hundred-and-forty-seventh iteration of the
> "What's the point of mocks?" discussion on this list, David Chelimsky
> ended a message with:
>
>> [ . . . ] Really, I think
>> that's what we should all be striving for.
So... In the recent five-hundred-and-forty-seventh iteration of the
"What's the point of mocks?" discussion on this list, David Chelimsky
ended a message with:
> [ . . . ] Really, I think
> that's what we should all be striving for. Not so much "should I use
> mocks or not," but "when should I
13 matches
Mail list logo