On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:57 PM, BJ Clark wrote:
>> Fernando,
>>
>> They are easier to spec with Pat Maddox's "no peeping toms" plugin.
>> http://github.com/pat-maddox/no-peeping-toms/tree/master
>
> I use Pat's no-peeping-toms plugin as well.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:57 PM, BJ Clark wrote:
> Fernando,
>
> They are easier to spec with Pat Maddox's "no peeping toms" plugin.
> http://github.com/pat-maddox/no-peeping-toms/tree/master
I use Pat's no-peeping-toms plugin as well. It's a great tool in Rails toolbox.
Brandon Keepers has made
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM, BJ Clark wrote:
> Fernando,
>
> They are easier to spec with Pat Maddox's "no peeping toms" plugin.
> http://github.com/pat-maddox/no-peeping-toms/tree/master
>
FWIW, I was not able to run specs surrounded by a with_observer call when
using mislav-will_paginate.
Fernando,
They are easier to spec with Pat Maddox's "no peeping toms" plugin.
http://github.com/pat-maddox/no-peeping-toms/tree/master
BJ Clark
On May 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi,
Before I do anything stupid, I'd like to know if there are any gotchas
when using Rails obser
Hi,
Before I do anything stupid, I'd like to know if there are any gotchas
when using Rails observers instead of writing my own methods or
callbacks? Are they easy to spec/test or will I run into troubles? Are
they easily mockable?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
