Re: [rspec-users] proposition: warn on rake spec - group :test

2010-07-30 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:09 AM, Rainer Kuhn wrote: > On Jul 29, 3:29 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Rainer Kuhn wrote: >> >>> Consider putting out some information on rake spec, when rspec ist >>> only defined in the :test group. >>> This just cost me an hour until I read

Re: [rspec-users] proposition: warn on rake spec - group :test

2010-07-30 Thread Rainer Kuhn
That's not entirely true, there is a diffence between lot loaded and not defined, let me show you: This is without rspec in the dev group, so it does not show in rake - T: ~/work/myproject$ rake spec (in /Users/rainerkuhn/work/myproject) ~/work/myproject$ rake IdontExist (in /Users/rainerkuhn/wo

Re: [rspec-users] proposition: warn on rake spec - group :test

2010-07-29 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Rainer Kuhn wrote: > Consider putting out some information on rake spec, when rspec ist > only defined in the :test group. > This just cost me an hour until I read the blog post explaining it. > > Thing is, rake spec doesn't show on "rake -T" but it runs fine, just >

[rspec-users] proposition: warn on rake spec - group :test

2010-07-29 Thread Rainer Kuhn
Consider putting out some information on rake spec, when rspec ist only defined in the :test group. This just cost me an hour until I read the blog post explaining it. Thing is, rake spec doesn't show on "rake -T" but it runs fine, just not doing anything. One line of output, like: "Either use RA