I noticed this strange behaviour in a spec, and was wondering if it was considered a bug (it certainly took me by surprise):
http://gist.github.com/80261 The respond_to matcher specs seem to show this behaviour as intended: http://gist.github.com/80262 Scott _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
