Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-04 Thread steven shingler
Hi Rick, Thanks for your reply. You are right that this step is basically testing the basic actions of a controller, and is being run as part of a story_with_steps stack. The step itself is definitely being hit, because I have a: response.should have_tag('li', @title) ...in the same step, and that

Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-04 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM, steven shingler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Rick, Thanks for your reply. You are right that this step is basically testing the basic actions of a controller, and is being run as part of a story_with_steps stack. The step itself is definitely being hit,

Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-04 Thread steven shingler
Hi Rick - Thanks again. Cool - I see what you mean about what the story steps should get involved with, and what should be left to the specs. In that case, my response.should have_tag('li', @title) is a reasonable test, and I'll leave it at that! All the best, Steven On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:36

[rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-03 Thread steven shingler
hi all, i'm just trying to check a partial has been rendered, by using: response.template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial = tasks/list) this passes, even if I put something bogus in the partial name, such as: response.template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial = ___tassdfsdfks/list)