Re: [rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

2011-04-02 Thread Pat Maddox
On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote: > I use RSpec mock and stub like this: > > hit = mock("hit", :stored => 5) > > This works fine, but when using this instead: > > hit = mock("hit").stub(:stored) { 5 } Not that it's really necessary, but to make this work you can do: hit = mock('h

Re: [rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

2011-04-02 Thread Kai Schlamp
> hit = mock('hit') > hit.stub(:stored) { 5 } > hit.stored.should eq(5) > > Make sense? Of course :-) Thanks. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

2011-04-02 Thread David Chelimsky
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote: > I use RSpec mock and stub like this: > > hit = mock("hit", :stored => 5) > > This works fine, but when using this instead: > > hit = mock("hit").stub(:stored) { 5 } > > then I get > > undefined method `stored' for # 0xb688bb78> > > I always th

[rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

2011-04-02 Thread Kai Schlamp
I use RSpec mock and stub like this: hit = mock("hit", :stored => 5) This works fine, but when using this instead: hit = mock("hit").stub(:stored) { 5 } then I get undefined method `stored' for # I always thought both were equivalent. Can someone enlighten me? Regards, Kai __