Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-08 Thread Bart Zonneveld
On 7 mei 2009, at 19:12, Kero van Gelder wrote: So let me get this right, you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. by top posting lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come across well over email I suppose. Not only that, he did it in so it was impossible for me to

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-07 Thread Kero van Gelder
>> So let me get this right, >> >> you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. >> >> by top posting >> > lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come across well over email > I suppose. Not only that, he did it in so it was impossible for me to see whether it was top or bottom

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Nicholas Van Weerdenburg
Nick: How about On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Francis Hwang < s...@fhwang.net> wrote: > side posting How about both top and bottom posting? > as a > compromise? Francis Hwang > http://fhwang.net/ > > On May 6, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Be

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Andrew Vit
On May 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ben Mabey wrote: + 1 aslak hellesoy wrote: Folks, *snip* Thanks, Aslak So let me get this right, you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. by top posting And Aslak's post was multipart/mim

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Francis Hwang
How about both top and bottom posting? Francis Hwang http://fhwang.net/ On May 6, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Ben Mabey wrote: lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come across well over email I suppose. How about both top and bottom posting? Francis Hwang http://fhwang.net/ __

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Steve Schafer
Just so you know, _your_ message isn't just plain text. Here's a portion of the raw message: >--===0527642389== >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b0eedf7860046942ecfc > >--001636c5b0eedf7860046942ecfc >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Ben Mabey
Rick DeNatale wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ben Mabey wrote: + 1 aslak hellesoy wrote: Folks, *snip* Thanks, Aslak So let me get this right, you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. by top posting lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come acr

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ben Mabey wrote: > + 1 > > > aslak hellesoy wrote: > > Folks, > > *snip* > > Thanks, > Aslak So let me get this right, you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. by top posting -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: htt

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Ben Mabey
+ 1 aslak hellesoy wrote: Folks, *snip* Thanks, Aslak ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-u

Re: [rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread Julian Leviston
On 07/05/2009, at 4:54 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote: Folks, I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top posting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style ). If you have a [Cucumber] topic, please respond with inline comments. And use plain text email - not html. I find it

[rspec-users] top posting and plain text

2009-05-06 Thread aslak hellesoy
Folks, I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top posting ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style). If you have a [Cucumber] topic, please respond with inline comments. And use plain text email - not html. Thanks, Aslak ___ rspec-us