[rspec-users] why should_receive failure?

2009-07-14 Thread Zhenning Guan
class PeepCode def awesome awesome end end describe PeepCode do it should fuck do PeepCode.new.should_receive(:awesome).and_return(awesome) end end - Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in 'PeepCode should fuck' #PeepCode:0xb7aa3bbc

Re: [rspec-users] why should_receive failure?

2009-07-14 Thread Jim Gay
On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Zhenning Guan wrote: class PeepCode def awesome awesome end end describe PeepCode do it should fuck do peep = PeepCode.new peep.should_receive(:awesome).and_return(awesome) peep.awesome #this completes the expectation above #

Re: [rspec-users] why should_receive failure?

2009-07-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Zhenning Guanli...@ruby-forum.com wrote: class PeepCode  def awesome    awesome  end end describe PeepCode do  it should fuck do   PeepCode.new.should_receive(:awesome).and_return(awesome)  end end -

Re: [rspec-users] why should_receive failure?

2009-07-14 Thread Julian Leviston
because Peepcode.new doesn't receive the awesome message. like it says... Julian. On 15/07/2009, at 12:59 PM, Zhenning Guan wrote: class PeepCode def awesome awesome end end describe PeepCode do it should fuck do PeepCode.new.should_receive(:awesome).and_return(awesome) end end