Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move
rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control.
For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but
it would be a nice "toe in the water" with BitKeeper to get some
practical experience befor
Title: FREE AUCTION SITE! BUY SELL AND TRADE FOR FREE!
FREE AUCTION
SITE! BUY SELL AND
TRADE
FOR FREE!
Check out
the most recent
#1 rated NEW
online
auction!
This is where you get to sell all of your items for FREE!
On 5 Dec 2001 at 15:02, Martin Pool wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:02:34 +1100
From: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Juan J. L?pez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Netware modif
On 5 Dec 2001 at 15:02, Martin Pool wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:02:34 +1100
From: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Juan J. L?pez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Netware modif
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> write_batch_argvs_file (orig_argc=-2, argc=0, argv=0x0) at batch.c:153
> 153if ( !strcmp(argv[i],"-F") ){ /* safer to change it here
> than script*/
I'm not proud of this fix, but at least it makes -F/--write-batch work
proper
I'm getting messages that look like this:
bit length overflow
code 6 bits 6->7
in rsync-2.5.1pre3 (and in 2.4.7pre4)
Is that an error, or a piece of verbose logging? the return code was zero,
which makes me think that everything's okay.
--
Daniel Sadinoff, Goldman, Sachs & Co
212-357
On 5 Dec 2001, Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's set to localhost because this is going over an stunnel. Yes, I did
> try it without the stunnel and same results. How can I debug this. This
> is 2.4.6 on both sides because 2.5.0 just fails completely for uploading
> and downl
We're looking at using rsync over an encrypted link, and are debating the
virtues of ssh vs stunnel.
I know rsync can hammer a network-layer implementation, so have others done
this, and if so, which is better - rsync over ssh or rsync over stunnel?
I leaning towards stunnel as it's just a "pure
AHH, thank you very much!
-jeremy
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:05:19PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > It claims my module is read only, but it is not:
> >
> > [test]
> > uid = root
> > gid = root
> > path = /home/www/www
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:05:19PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> It claims my module is read only, but it is not:
>
> [test]
> uid = root
> gid = root
> path = /home/www/www.blah.com-test
> comment = this is a test
> auth users = blah
> secrets file
These are two redhat machines, running 6.2.
server side error in systlog:
Dec 5 12:11:25 geo rsyncd[15335]: rsync to test/ from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (192.168.0.50)
Dec 5 12:11:25 geo rsyncd[15335]: transfer interrupted (code 1) at
main.c(401)
This is the error not going over stunnel.
Thanks
For some reason I'm having a problem uploading to an rsync server:
[root@csa i386]# rsync -azvv --progress --stats /home/www/www.blah.com/*
blah@localhost::test/
Password:
building file list ... done
ERROR: module is read only
unexpected EOF in read_timeout
It claims my module is read only, b
rsync://samba.org/rsyncftp/preview/
rsync 2.5.1 (sometime in 2001?)
ENHANCEMENTS:
* --progress and -P now show estimated data transfer rate (in a
multiple of bytes/s) and estimated time to completion. Based
on a patch by Rik Faith.
* --no-detach option, required t
On 21 Nov 2001, Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:54:18AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Here's a patch, based on Max Bowsher's patch. If deemed useful I will supply
> the man patch as well.
--no-detach patch committed.
--
Martin
14 matches
Mail list logo
