Wouldn't using detached signatures make more sense for this application?
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Can't seem to find the answer anywhere...
I'm currently using an rsync script on the source box to transfer some
individual files to the destination box...all works well. The script:
rsync -e ssh \
/var/qmail/control/file1 \
/var/qmail/control/file2 \
/var/qmail/control/file3 \
++
Tim,
thanks for the help...but, it still isn't working.
any more ideas?
I have tried:
rsync -avv --include /film/jonah/**/sourceimages/*.tif --exclude *
/film /tmp
rsync -avv --include
Seems to me that the simplest solution is to name the directory
explicitly:
rsync -a --include */ --include *.tif --exclude * /film/jonah /tmp/film
To accomplish the same thing using includes, you could do this:
rsync -a --include /jonah --include /jonah/**/ --include *.tif \
I filed this as bug 4150 http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/
We had a few hundred hung processes and reached the limit for max user
processes (see the ulimit command). rsync did not handle this very
well. It passed -1 as a PID to kill(). When kill() gets -1, it kills all
of the processes
Bart Brashers wrote:
... I mount them using samba (to avoid having to install the
cygwin version on each box) then run (using rsync 2.5.2 run from crontab)
rsync -vuaz --delete-excluded --exclude-from=/root/bin/rsync.exclude \
--modify-window=2 /mnt/pc/machine/share
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Jeff Field wrote:
rsync -e ssh source-box.x.com:/var/qmail/control/file1 \
source-box.x.com:/var/qmail/control/file2 \
source-box.x.com:/var/qmail/control/file3 \
source-box.x.com:/var/qmail/control/file4 \
/var/qmail/control
You can't have multiple
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:22:40AM -0600, Kim Scarborough wrote:
it looks like you're correct in your assesment of the problem
(i.e. the whole file is copied). You don't say what version of rsync
you're running, but there may be a bug in the current version introduced
recently with the
On 19 Mar 2002, Paul Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I filed this as bug 4150 http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/
Jitterbug, good, but I don't think anybody is really maintaining
it at the moment. (For example, there are 733 messages in incoming.)
I wonder if it would be better to just
On Tuesday 19 Mar 02, Raviraj Murdeshwar writes:
Hi,
i have downloaded rsync 2.5.4 source and was trying to compile it on win2k
machine.
is it supported on win2k machine ?
It requires Cygwin, which you can get from http://cygwin.com/.
Moreover, you can install rsync directly using the
10 matches
Mail list logo