Re: signing tarballs

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
Martin left off some context that might confuse some list readers. I had inquired about how to sign the pre-release tarball. I signed 2.5.6pre1 with my personal key, but Martin suggested there be a team key. On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:42:53AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: [replied to list]

Re: umask for rsync

2003-01-16 Thread Aaron Morris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I suppose if you wanted a hack, that would work. I was really looking at something that could be used on a per module basis in rsyncd.conf or on the command line. A commercial rsync competitor, TeamSite OpenDeploy, has a file mode and a dir mode

Re: Latest --files-from patch

2003-01-16 Thread Andrew J. Schorr
Hi Wayne, I ran a simple test of your patch at http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rsync-files-from.patch and it worked fine for me. The performance was just about the same as for my --source-list patch. Thanks, Andy -- To unsubscribe or change options:

Re: Long-pending patch for Stratus VOS build

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
I think the below patch is the cause of the failure of the Irix 6.5 type on build.samba.org, because it is complaining about line 73 of the Makefile which at least on my Linux machine is rsync$(EXEEXT): $(OBJS) It might be easiest for somebody who has an Irix machine that they can use to

Re: rsync-2.5.5 memory eater problem

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
Thanks for the reminder. I checked in the second version. - Dave On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:45:03PM +0300, Sviatoslav Sviridov wrote: On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Ruediger Oertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, we ran into a little problem with rsync-2.5.5. Setup: you

Re: --copy-unsafe-links fix checked in

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:24:10PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:27:31AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: In my research into this I also found that 2-1/2 years ago somebody posted a patch that included a fix for this buried in it, and that I had promised to integrate his

Re: specifying a list of files to transfer

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:49:08PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:03:33AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:57:48PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: with the -r or -a options does this [recurse] on directories in the --files-from list? Yes, it treats

Re: umask for rsync

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
In that case it looks like you want the proposed --chmod option discussed at http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2002-March/006477.html and http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2003-January/009298.html Once it is a command line option it could easily be made into a per-module option

Possible patch for Irix Makefile problem

2003-01-16 Thread Paul_GreenVOS
I am guessing that since the error is on the first instance of the use of foo$(VAR): foo.o construct, that the Irix makefile parser doesn't know how to deal with this line. Obviously they don't use GNU make So here is a patch to Makefile.in that simplifies the use of variables. This

Re: specifying a list of files to transfer

2003-01-16 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:52:38PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: Also, if the transfer is being sent from the remote side, the file names are all getting sent over to the remote side first for --files-from and then sent back as part of the normal protocol, right? I had hoped we'd be able to

Re: IPv6 hosts allow|deny

2003-01-16 Thread Bert Vermeulen
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Dykstra wrote: I don't understand enough how that syntax works in order to be able to write an explanation for people. Could you please try to write something up based on the current version checked in to CVS? Here's a patch for the manpage:

unsafe_symlink change (Re: CVS update: rsync)

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
The patch from 2-1/2 years ago for changing copy-unsafe-links to follow unsafe links on the destination side also included essentially this patch. When I looked at it, however, I asked why in the world is unsafe_symlink() doing strdup() in the first place. I think you could get rid of the calls

Re: unsafe_symlink change (Re: CVS update: rsync)

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:44:44PM -0500, Scott Mcdermott wrote: Dave Dykstra on Thu 16/01 14:33 -0600: The patch from 2-1/2 years ago for changing copy-unsafe-links to follow unsafe links on the destination side also included essentially this patch. just to be clear, without using

Re: unsafe_symlink change (Re: CVS update: rsync)

2003-01-16 Thread Scott Mcdermott
Dave Dykstra on Thu 16/01 14:57 -0600: The patch from 2-1/2 years ago for changing copy-unsafe-links to follow unsafe links on the destination side also included essentially this patch. just to be clear, without using copy-unsafe-links, rsync still copies absolute symlinks which

Re: specifying a list of files to transfer

2003-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:49:08PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: You seem to see the files-from as a way of replacing command-line args where i see it as a way of replacing the tree scan. I actually think of it as both, since I also consider the command-line as a way of replacing the tree scan.

Re: specifying a list of files to transfer

2003-01-16 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:07:13PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:49:08PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: You seem to see the files-from as a way of replacing command-line args where i see it as a way of replacing the tree scan. I actually think of it as both, since I

Re: Why is rsyncd trying to access /etc/pwd.db?

2003-01-16 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:30:35PM -0800, Hans Zaunere wrote: I have rsync-2.5.5 humming along on FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE with no apparent problems. However, I notice when some clients connect to sync, I get this in /var/log/messages rsyncd[42843]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory

Re: .rsync-/.rsync+ patch and --link-dest example

2003-01-16 Thread John Bowman
The patch below supercedes my patch dated 14 Jan 2003. The new version fixes serious problems due to memory reallocation/freeing of lists and is also more efficient. The scheme has been simplified to store excluded patterns in .rsync only (a + pattern prefix may be used to force inclusion).

Re: specifying a list of files to transfer

2003-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:06:05PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: [...] and that entries therein are not flattened like they would be on the command-line (sans -R). But they *are* flattened exactly like on the command-line, at least in my current patch they are. That's what -R is for -- telling

Re: unsafe_symlink change (Re: CVS update: rsync)

2003-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:33:26PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: I think you could get rid of the calls to strdup() and the new local variables and possibly do a couple casts inside the function instead. You wouldn't want to carve up the const strings with strtok() (which adds nulls to the

Re: unsafe_symlink change (Re: CVS update: rsync)

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
Sorry, another mistake on my part -- I didn't realize the strtok side effect. It doesn't look to me like your new code looks at the last component of the path like the old one might have. It would probably be a good idea to put tests ending in /.., for example foo/../.. and foo/.., into

Re: unsafe_symlink change (Re: CVS update: rsync)

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:08:01PM -0500, Scott Mcdermott wrote: Dave Dykstra on Thu 16/01 14:57 -0600: The patch from 2-1/2 years ago for changing copy-unsafe-links to follow unsafe links on the destination side also included essentially this patch. just to be clear, without

CVS update: rsync

2003-01-16 Thread dwd
Date: Thu Jan 16 20:09:31 2003 Author: dwd Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19090 Modified Files: NEWS cleanup.c Log Message: Prevent infinite recursion in exit_cleanup(). Patch from Sviatoslav Sviridov. Revisions: NEWS1.82 = 1.83