On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:46:52PM +, Loris Serena wrote:
[...]
> Can anyone help me with this?
> I cannot install gcc or make on this box, and I don't have another Solaris 8 64 bits
>where I could
> compile it on and then copy it across!
> I only have Solaris 7, or Solaris 9 64bit boxes avail
jw schultz wrote:
>
> I was thinking more in terms of no block relocation at all.
> Checksums only match if at the same offset. The receiver simply
> discards (or never gets) info about blocks that are
> unchanged. It would just lseek and write with a possible
> truncate at the end.
This would
I've learned some good things from this discussion. THanks.
Kenny, I have one concern/idea -- The original post says the 'disk is
fairly slow'. That is one bottleneck that should probably be examined a
little more. How fast are your disks? HOw fast is your network? An IDE
disk with DMA disabled mi
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:47:49PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The reason why in-place updating is difficult is that
> > rsync expects the unchanged blocks in the old file may be
> > relocated. Data inserted into or removed from the file
On 4 Feb 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason why in-place updating is difficult is that
> rsync expects the unchanged blocks in the old file may be
> relocated. Data inserted into or removed from the file does
> not require the rest of the file to be retransmitted.
> Unchang
Hello -
I do some rsyncing of windows files through a samba share. Is there
anyway to preserve windows permissions if needed to be restored?
Thanks - Max
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:38:06PM -0700, Dalton Harvie wrote:
> I'm trying to get a backup system going using rsync --- bit of a newbie.
> Just wondering if there is a way I can get rsync to recognise that a
> non-gzipped file in one directory tree is equivalent to the same gzipped file
> in t
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:29:48AM -0800, Kenny Gorman wrote:
> I am rsyncing 1tb of data each day. I am finding in my testing that
> actually removing the target files each day then rsyncing is faster than
> doing a compare of the source->target files then rsyncing over the delta
> blocks. Th
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:37:26PM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2003-02-04T14:29:48 Kenny Gorman:
> > Is it possible to tell rsync to update the blocks of the target file
> > 'in-place' without creating the temp file (the 'dot file')? I can
> > guarantee that no other operations are being perfor
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:06:26PM +0200, Mikko Rauhala wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003, jw schultz wrote:
> > Just how magic is the 1024? To what was bwlimit set? And
> > the MTU?
>
> The 1024 is very magic, I just pulled it out of my hat and 'lo, it
> worked well enough so I didn't touch it.
I'
I'm trying to get a backup system going using rsync --- bit of a newbie.
Just wondering if there is a way I can get rsync to recognise that a
non-gzipped file in one directory tree is equivalent to the same gzipped file
in the (say backup) tree, or vice versa. Could this be done with the
incl
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Steve Bonds wrote:
> You might try one of these ideas for your high-bandwidth environment:
> + hack receiver.c so that receive_data uses fd1 (the original file)
> - also comment out finish_transfer, which does the rename and
> sets the permissions. If perms are im
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kenny Gorman kgorman-at-paypal.com |Rsync List| wrote:
> My question is this:
>
> Is it possible to tell rsync to update the blocks of the target file
> 'in-place' without creating the temp file (the 'dot file')?
It does not look like this is possible. In receiver.c around l
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003, jw schultz wrote:
> Just how magic is the 1024? To what was bwlimit set? And
> the MTU?
The 1024 is very magic, I just pulled it out of my hat and 'lo, it
worked well enough so I didn't touch it. I've usually used bwlimits of
4-12 depending on the time of day (expected avai
Replying to self after re-reading the original message...
-W will probably help in that it disables the incremental checksum block
checking/scanning for the very large files. This is a good option to
consider if you have a very fast network.
rsync with -W will still probably create the .dest fi
I think the -W option might do what you would have described here.
eric
Kenny Gorman wrote:
I am rsyncing 1tb of data each day. I am finding in my testing that
actually removing the target files each day then rsyncing is faster
than doing a compare of the source->target files then rsyncing
2003-02-04T14:29:48 Kenny Gorman:
> Is it possible to tell rsync to update the blocks of the target file
> 'in-place' without creating the temp file (the 'dot file')? I can
> guarantee that no other operations are being performed on the file at
> the same time. The docs don't seem to indicate
I am rsyncing 1tb of data each day. I am finding in my testing that
actually removing the target files each day then rsyncing is faster than
doing a compare of the source->target files then rsyncing over the delta
blocks. This is because we have a fast link between the two boxes, and
that are
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, bob parker bob_parker-at-dodo.com.au |Rsync List| wrote:
> Maybe I'm barking completely up the wrong tree but here goes.
>
> I've downloaded a 700meg iso by ftp using a steam powered dial up
> connection. It took a week and naturally many resumes.
>
> Murphy's Law did not tak
bob parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asks:
> I've downloaded a 700meg iso by ftp using a steam powered dial up
connection.
> It took a week and naturally many resumes.
>
> Murphy's Law did not take a holiday of course so the md5sum of the
downloaded
> iso does not match the md5sum of the one at t
You can install gcc in any directory; you don't need root access to build
and install gcc (or any other gnu package) from source code. Just use the
--prefix control argument on configure. For example, I have a test
hierarchy and say:
configure --prefix=/h/paulg/prefix
The binaries go into
Hi
Maybe I'm barking completely up the wrong tree but here goes.
I've downloaded a 700meg iso by ftp using a steam powered dial up connection.
It took a week and naturally many resumes.
Murphy's Law did not take a holiday of course so the md5sum of the downloaded
iso does not match the md5sum o
Hi,
Can anyone help me with this?
I cannot install gcc or make on this box, and I don't have another Solaris 8 64 bits
where I could
compile it on and then copy it across!
I only have Solaris 7, or Solaris 9 64bit boxes available, but I can't believe it they
would be of
any use for compiling for
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:22:30PM +0530, Vardhan Varma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to pull my home from a remote machine.
> I get a error
> 'failed to set permissions on home : Not owner'
> which is obvious:
>
> rsync -a remote:/home/foo/bar/zee /
> this create /home/foo/bar/zee here , but gi
Hi,
I'm trying to pull my home from a remote machine.
I get a error
'failed to set permissions on home : Not owner'
which is obvious:
rsync -a remote:/home/foo/bar/zee /
this create /home/foo/bar/zee here , but give above error
I don't own /,/home but i own /home/foo/bar and lower.
If i tell
25 matches
Mail list logo
