How many bytes per file on average do you think EAs/ACLs will take up?
--
Ben Escoto
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:50:23AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> Access Control Lists (ACLs) and Extended Attributes (EA) are
> an area i have seen for some time as something rsync will
> need to address. I've put a tighter focus on this issue for
> the past week or so and have reached a few conclusi
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:45:18PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:50:23AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > Access Control Lists (ACLs) and Extended Attributes (EA) are
> > an area i have seen for some time as something rsync will
> > need to address. I've put a tighter focus on
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:55:21AM -0800, Ben Escoto wrote:
>
> How many bytes per file on average do you think EAs/ACLs will take up?
There is no way to know. It all depends on how they are
used. What is your average file size and how many terabytes
of storage will you manage in two years? (rh
I am still stuck with this problem. Does anyone have any advice?
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 7:10 PM
Subject: rsync2.5.6 can't find system config file
>
> I had rsync2.5.5 running fine ona RedHat Linu
> "JWS" == jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote the following on Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:25:47 -0800
JWS> What i do expect for the next few years is that almost all
JWS> files will have no EAs and that less than half will have ACLs.
JWS> I do however expect that ACL usage will affect en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:51, Chris Hare, CISSP, CISA wrote:
> I am still stuck with this problem. Does anyone have any advice?
Have you tried putting it in /etc/rsync/rsyncd.conf?
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Com
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:31:16PM -0800, Ben Escoto wrote:
> > "JWS" == jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote the following on Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:25:47 -0800
>
> JWS> What i do expect for the next few years is that almost all
> JWS> files will have no EAs and that less than half wi
