Hello,
Yes, both client and server are clean...but i think i know what the problem is
now. Server is using an ext3 fs, the client ext2 -- and trying to rsync a >2gb file
over to the client B).
i'll compile in ext3 support and try again. Thanks!
Jim Salter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Won't work. LOG_DAEMON is defined in syslog.h.
Didn't there use to be a HAVE_SYSLOG or USE_SYSLOG in the source before?
Unlikely. That isn't the sort of thing that gets removed.
OpenVMS currently does not have
Index: Makefile.in
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.96 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 30 Jul 2003 06:12:25 - 1.96
+++ Makefile.in 21 Sep 2003 13:51:46 -
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
DAEMON_OBJ
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Marco Nicosia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello. I'm having a problem using rsync to copy my root partition to a
> new disk. This disk has a previous copy on it, and rsync seems determined
> to (unnecessarily) delete files from it. Worse, despite the fact that the
> files DO
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I am trying to restart getting rsync to run on OpenVMS, and find a way
around the fork() issue, posibly using POSIX threads.
It occurs to me that i may have been overly encouraging in
my last followup.
Getting rsy
Hello. I'm having a problem using rsync to copy my root partition to a
new disk. This disk has a previous copy on it, and rsync seems determined
to (unnecessarily) delete files from it. Worse, despite the fact that the
files DO exist on the source, it does not update the destination, leaving
me wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 20:45, jw schultz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:35:47PM +0200, Andre Alexander Bell wrote:
> > Ok, but how do I do that? Isn't this the rsync process startet on the
> > other host? Or am I wrong here? Any tip how to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 20:53, jw schultz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:37:27PM +0200, Andre Alexander Bell wrote:
> > On Monday 06 October 2003 20:48, jw schultz wrote:
> > > updated. The third is for there to be corruption such as