I'm using a simple client/server backup pull model
rsync -a --delete -e ssh --exclude-from=$exclude path/$client.exclude \
${client}-rsync:/ $path/$client
but can't seem to find the right 'exclude' combination to fetch certain
directories but not their contents. Unfortunately this was found
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:11:31PM +0100, Kleiner Hampel wrote:
Hello,
i am syncing 2 directorys with rsync.
There is nothing to do (i didn't changed anything).
Here is the output:
building file list ... done
wrote 371 bytes read 20 bytes 782.00 bytes/sec
total size is 5062161
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:00:27PM +0800, Leaw, Chern Jian wrote:
HI,
I have a filesystem containing a symbolic link.
pglc0003 ls -l |grep TA
lrwxrwxrwx1 cleawadm26 Nov 19 17:23 TA -
/pgadm1/adm/cleaw/tempArea
I'd like to copy the symbolic link TA to the /tmp area,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 05:44:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using rsync to backup Maildir directories. Since it is very active,
some files are deleted (and some are added as new mail arrive) from the
time that the list of files are collected and the time of the actual
operation.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 04:15:13PM -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
I'm getting an error trying to pull a file with ssh/rsync:
$ rsync -e 'ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa' [EMAIL PROTECTED]::www/index.html index.html
rsync: unable to open configuration file rsyncd.conf: No such file or
directory
rsync
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:21:34PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
Passing the -t option to rsync seems to cause -v to show each directory
that is considered, while -v without -t doesn't.
Is this a known bug or intended feature? Or is there a way to defeat
this? I'd like -v to show the files
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:07:42PM -0500, Corey Johnson wrote:
Hello,
I have been using rsync for a long time to send web files from a development
server to a production server. It worked great
until a few days ago when I upgraded the firmware on the Linksys BEFSR11
Router that the
jw schultz wrote:
I've not tried it but auth users permits the use of shell
wildcards in user names so
auth users = *
would restrict the users to all of those listed in the
secrets file. If you wish different user lists for
different modules just use module-specific secrets files.
That would be
Hi,
I had this problem as well but /etc, and /etc/rsyncd.conf
are readable by all. I fixed it by giving a symlink from
the user directory to the config file. When I chroot, the
manpage says something to this effect. But is a symlink the
correct method of fixing it?
$ rsync -e 'ssh -i
Since I have gotten no replies I think it may be because it
was too long. Hence, this one is streamlined.
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:08:22 -0800
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use the new interface style:
rsync --rsh=ssh -l username -i key src
[EMAIL PROTECTED]::module,
On Dec 2, 2003, at 2:00 AM, jw schultz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:21:34PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
Passing the -t option to rsync seems to cause -v to show each
directory
that is considered, while -v without -t doesn't.
Is this a known bug or intended feature? Or is there a way to
Sometimes, I see this error when the src file/dir is
incorrect.
Linux aspen 2.4.18-evms #1 Sat Nov 8 00:32:46 GMT-7 2003
i686 unknown rsync: read error: Connection reset by
peer rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream
(code12) at io.c(177)
C:\kdi
Brian
ContagiousDesign!
web
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
But the directory inode doesn't need to be updated. It is up to date.
If the modified time of the directory is not identical, it gets updated,
just like any other file. If it is identical, you won't see it
mentioned. Unfortunately,
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
But the directory inode doesn't need to be updated. It is up to date.
If the modified time of the directory is not identical, it gets
updated,
just like any other file. If it is
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
But the directory inode doesn't need to be updated. It is up to date.
If the modified time of the directory is not identical, it gets
updated,
just like any other file. If it is
Forgot to mention this:
server: rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26
clients: rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24
Also I found this at http://rsync.samba.org/fom-serve/cache/93.html:
How do I use rsync to replicate a directory structure without
copying any files?
rsync -av
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:30:55AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
But the directory inode doesn't need to be updated. It is up to date.
If the modified time of the directory is not
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:57:00PM -0800, tim wrote:
Forgot to mention this:
server: rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26
clients: rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24
Almost nobody can comment on the behavior of rsync versions
from the previous millenium. There have been too many
jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:57:00PM -0800, tim wrote:
Forgot to mention this:
server: rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26
clients: rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24
Almost nobody can comment on the behavior of rsync versions
from the previous millenium. There
On Dec 2, 2003, at 6:27 PM, jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:30:55AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
But the directory inode doesn't need to be updated. It is up to
date.
If the
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:58:39PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 6:27 PM, jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:30:55AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
But the
If you have to use Rsync over multiple networks you need to
get past firewalls. Very few firewalls allow anything beyond
HTTP port 80. Has anyone researched tunneling Rsync
through HTTP and is there any documentation available.
That's not rsync over http, that's rsync on port 80. Use ssh as
22 matches
Mail list logo
