Re: rsync performance question

2004-01-08 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:05:25PM -0500, Rick Frerichs wrote: > Hello, > > I seem to be having a performance problem with rsync. > I have done some testing of rsync and ftp. If I do > a transfer (either way) with ftp, I get about 500 Kbytes/sec. > Using rsync to do the same transfer (either way)

Re: 2.6.0 fails to configure if --disable-ipv6 is specified...

2004-01-08 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:44:19AM -0600, Peter Fales wrote: > ...because the code which sets $EGREP is not hit in this case Thanks for pointing that out. I've added an explicit AC_PROG_EGREP directive to the configure.in, which should fix that right up. The version of configure I just checked i

chroot and pwd.db file not found ...

2004-01-08 Thread Bill Moran
This has been asked before, but my question is somewhat different. On FreeBSD, the message: rsyncd[520]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory is obviously caused by a chrooted rsyncd being unable to access /etc/pwd.db to get at the password database to convert UIDs to names and back. Workorounds

rsync performance question

2004-01-08 Thread Rick Frerichs
Hello, I seem to be having a performance problem with rsync. I have done some testing of rsync and ftp. If I do a transfer (either way) with ftp, I get about 500 Kbytes/sec. Using rsync to do the same transfer (either way) I only get about 50 Kbytes/sec. I am only testing straight file copies.

Re: [patch] making rsync less verbose

2004-01-08 Thread Dick Streefland
On Thursday 2004-01-08 02:38, Wayne Davison wrote: | I think I favor the current approach for the default -v output. If you | just want to see the filenames, that seems like it should be a separate | option. Perhaps using the suggested -s to mean "show me the file names"? | That's my opinion, any

Re: mirror problem

2004-01-08 Thread Sven Neuhaus
I saw this in the archives (but no reply) so I dug it up again..: Damian Lee wrote on Mon, 01 Sep 2003 07:05:38 +: > I am currently useing rsync to mirroring my ftp server. > And I have do a successful transfer in the firt time. > But gets errors in the second time I try to run the same comme

Re: [patch] making rsync less verbose

2004-01-08 Thread jw schultz
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Dick Streefland wrote: > Unless you suppress all output with the -q option, rsync will always > print an initial "building/receiving file list ... done" line. In my > opinion, this is a bit superfluous. When I want to see a progress > indication, I can use

Re: BUG in 2.6.0: make test failes if build dir is not source dir

2004-01-08 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:49:52PM +0100, Stefan Nehlsen wrote: > If the directory you build rsync in differs from the sourcedir "make test" > failes: Thanks for pointing this out. I've checked in a fix that should now call the wildtest program with a TESTFILE argument that includes the proper $s

Re: [patch] making rsync less verbose

2004-01-08 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Dick Streefland wrote: > Attached are two patches to reduce the verbosity of rsync. The first > one removes the initial line. The second patch adds a new option > -s/--speedup to control the generation of the speedup report, which is > now disabled by defau

Re: Implementing rsync hard-link improvements

2004-01-08 Thread John Van Essen
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:33:36 -0800, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:15:57PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > >> Runtime variable sized structures should be avoided. Do you want >> to make rdev, link and sum conditional also? > > The difference between these other i