On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:21:24AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> I can partially reproduce this by (starting from a state where the two
> dirs are in sync) copying an additional file into 'Recommended' and
> trying different versions of rsync to see whether the file gets
> removed.
Does the file you
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:01:34AM -0400, Kevin Kallsen wrote:
> 2004/04/20 02:00:00 [2702] rsyncd version 2.6.0 starting, listening on port 873
> 2004/04/20 02:00:59 [2707] rsyncd version 2.6.0 starting, listening on port 873
> 2004/04/20 02:00:59 [2707] rsync: open inbound socket on port 873 fail
hello,
i have network 10.42.20.0/24. Every machine has installed rsync. How to wrapp
them(all machines), that only one of them (10.42.20.43) should has access to
all of them. Is solution in /etc/hosts.allow, deny?
thanks,
huloslav
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/ma
I use rsync-current. I tried to do something like:
rsync --delete -anvc /dir1 /dir2
It is natural to expect to see printed out all files that
would be updated including files that would be deleted.
But such invocation do not print files that would be
deleted.
--
To unsubscribe or change option
> Wayne Davison writes:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:21:24AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> I can partially reproduce this by (starting from a state where the two
>> dirs are in sync) copying an additional file into 'Recommended' and
>> trying different versions of rsync to see whether the file
On Thu 22 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> i have network 10.42.20.0/24. Every machine has installed rsync. How to wrapp
> them(all machines), that only one of them (10.42.20.43) should has access to
> all of them. Is solution in /etc/hosts.allow, deny?
Do you have rsync running as a daem
On Thu 22 Apr 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:48:58 -0700
> From: Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Kevin Kallsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.2 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.63
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Error?
> On Thu
Can we see the crontab line? For some reason, you're repeating the daemon
startup.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the latest rsync running on mandrake official 10. At 2:30 I run
rsync --daemon from cron to
1 2 * * * rsync --daemon
0 8 * * * killall rsync
-Original Message-
From: Tim Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:25 AM
To: Kevin Kallsen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error?
Can we see the crontab line? For some reason, you're repea
Thanks Wayne!
Both options worked well -- upgrading clients to 2.6.0 or using /.
instead of / to specify the root directory.
Perhaps a recap for the regulars here, but maybe useful to some -- I found
that I only needed to upgrade to 2.6.0 on the remote/source side.
Upgrading to 2.6.0 on my back
I'm using rsync to copy some large (>1GB) oracle datafiles. I've noticed
that sometimes it transfers some of the files twice.
Some earlier posts to this list that I saw in the archives seemed to
indicate that this is a problem with the rsync algorithm itself when
dealing with large files. Some of
I can't address the algoritm questions but I'll tell you that we
had a tremendous improvement is speed when we switched to a newer
version of rsync.
We are using it (in this case) to rsync our oracle files to a
separate partition on the system cpu.
> I'm using rsync to copy some large (>1GB) ora
OK, I'm stumped.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 2 * * * rsync --daemon
0 8 * * * killall rsync
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.c
Thanks Wayne! That's doing the trick. I've been playing with combinations
and am now getting what I expect.
I think I'll be using something close to this for my exclude file to get
what I want.
+ /testdir/*
- /*/
Combining that with different modules will make it a much simpler task.
Thanks!
-
I'd bet there's something else starting up rsync besides cron. Possibly
a script in periodic, possibly a startup/init script, possibly something
in another crontab, possibly inetd/xinetd.
Check ALL the possible locations for things that periodically get fired
off to startup programs, and get b
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:06:58PM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> Is there a way of overriding the excludes from .cvsignore?
It depends on which one you mean. The global ones are inserted into the
exclude list at the point they're mentioned. For instance:
rsync --include='*.tar.gz' -C from/ to
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:23:18AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> I can't address the algoritm questions but I'll tell you that we
> had a tremendous improvement is speed when we switched to a newer
> version of rsync.
Yes, rsync 2.6.0 has some big improvements in the checksum processing
for large
I'm using rsync to mirror my Sharp SL-5500 Linux PDA
home directory to my Linux desktop over a
TCP/IP-on-USB link.
I'm running the following command as root on the 5500:
/home/QtPalmtop/bin/rsync -av /home/zaurus \
192.168.129.1::zaurus
I'm running the rsync server out of xinetd. I have
veri
You're using the -a flag, which among other things means rsync will try
to preserve ownership. If your PDA is running linux, most likely the
UID it's using for ownership of the files you're transferring matches
the UID of your "Lefty" account on your PC.
Jim Salter
JRS Systems
I'm using rsync
Greetings,
Upon a suggestion to improve the --timelimit patch, I have also added a --stopat
option.
You can get the patch from this URL and/or cut/paste it from below.
http://www.terry.uga.edu/~jft/rsync-timelimit-stopat.patch.gz
Here are the details...
--timelimit=T
This option all
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> * Per-file dynamic block size is now sqrt(file length). The
> per-file checksum size is determined according to an algorithm
> provided by Donovan Baarda which reduces the probability of rsync
> algorithm corrupting data and fallin
Hello all,
I am having a problem with rsync. I want to backup data from one machine to another
remote machine. I have Freebsd4.7 on source and FreeBSD4.9 on destination machines.
rsync is installed on both the machines. I gave the following command at the source
machine.
rsync -avvznrbe rsh /
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:42:44AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The global [cvs-excludes] are inserted into the exclude list at the
> point they're mentioned.
Sorry, that was based on a false remembrance. The global cvs-excludes
are always appended to the list after the user-supplied exclude opt
Hi.
I found and reported a bug about a year ago regarding
symbolic links but haven't seen any mention of it
since and it is still present in 2.6.1-pre2.
Just want to make sure it isn't forgotten.
It can be reproduced by synchronizing two directories,
one of which contains a normal file and the o
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:01:29PM -0700, Peter Sturdza wrote:
> I found and reported a bug about a year ago regarding
> symbolic links but haven't seen any mention of it
> since and it is still present in 2.6.1-pre2.
>
> Just want to make sure it isn't forgotten.
Thanks for the reminder. I hope
--- Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> The way rsync currently works, it doesn't consider a
> file and a symlink
> to be the same thing, so the -u option will not
> prevent a file from
> being replaced by a symlink.
> ...
Hmm. But the symlink is older. I would expect the
symlink t
spervmamax is formulated to:
Improve overall spergm production
Improve speram quality
Improve sperpm integrity
Improve spercm motility
Improve sperdm morphology
http://happyyou.net/sm/index.php?pid=eph9058
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
B
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:54:57PM -0700, Peter Sturdza wrote:
> Hmm. But the symlink is older. I would expect the symlink to
> overwrite an older file, but not a newer one, which it does.
If it was an "older" directory, would you expect it to also not replace
a newer file? Rsync doesn't work t
--- Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will consider such a change for the future, but
> I'll have to spend time contemplating the
> repercussions.
Thanks. If you decide against changing the behavior,
then please add a note in the man page (perhaps where
the -u option is explained and
> Wayne Davison writes:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:42:44AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>> The global [cvs-excludes] are inserted into the exclude list at the
>> point they're mentioned.
> Sorry, that was based on a false remembrance. The global cvs-excludes
> are always appended to the lis
30 matches
Mail list logo
