On Fri 21 May 2004, Wallace Matthews wrote:
Since --bwlimit depends upon sleep(1 second), I repeated the experiment with a file
that was 383 Megabyte so that when I am running unthrottled it takes significantly
longer than a second (ie. ~50 seconds) to complete. I get the same bi-modal
On Fri 21 May 2004, Markus Gaugusch wrote:
Imagine this happenings:
10:00: file a.txt gets uploaded to ftp server
10:01: file a.txt is rsynced to samba server
10:02: file a.txt gets deleted from samba server (after rsync run)
10:03: file would again be synced :(
Now I think that I need a
On Thu 20 May 2004, Tim Harsch wrote:
firewall allows ssh connections if inititiated from I to O, but not if the
other way.
both machines have an /etc/rsyncd.conf of:
[rt]
path = /tmp/rsync_test
comment = Test area
O runs rsync daemon, I initiates a rsync cammnad like
rsync
On Fri 21 May 2004, Pascal Nobus wrote:
When used this command in cron
00 01 * * * rsync -av --delete /mnt/web1 /mass/kuurne/day
00 02 * * * rsync -av --delete /mnt/web2 /mass/kuurne/day
etc..
Rsync hangs, it doesn't finish!
Does it eat cpu time, of does it just sit there?
Use
On Mon 17 May 2004, Greger Cronquist wrote:
I'm wondering if the following is rsync-related or an issue with my
supposedly synchronous internet connection:
I have a server running an rsync daemon. When I simultaneously pull and
push files to this server using two separate processes on
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 17 May 2004, Greger Cronquist wrote:
I'm wondering if the following is rsync-related or an issue with my
supposedly synchronous internet connection:
I have a server running an rsync daemon. When I simultaneously pull and
push files to this server using two
I agree with Paul. It's almost certainly hour WAN link. My own at home
often gives sustained downloads in excess of 2Mbps, This seems to be
throttled by the cube of the difference between upload speed and 16kbps.
When I get up to 10kbps up, it's still useable. At 12, it's like a 21,400
I think this would be an excellent addition to rsync and could find many
applications for it myself. However like Markus I haven't the time or
the programing knowledge to make it myself.
just wanted to get my two cents worth in,
Matt
Markus Gaugusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/21/04 04:10PM
Hi,
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:46:35AM -0700, Tim Harsch wrote:
both machines have an /etc/rsyncd.conf of:
[rt]
path = /tmp/rsync_test
comment = Test area
Note that there is no read only = no, so this area cannot be written
to. That may well be why the upload command you mentioned
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
I can repeat this time after time. If --bwlimit is 4000 (ie. 4005,
4025, 4050,5000,7500,1,10) real is in the same range as 4001.
If --bwlimit is 4000 or under (ie. 3725, 2000, 1000, 100) real is in
the same range as
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:54:42PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
I'm looking into some of the old bwlimit patches to see about
improving this.
Here's a potential patch to make --bwlimit better. This started with
Roger's idea on accumulating delay until we have enough to make a sleep
call without
Date: Mon May 24 18:38:05 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7253
Modified Files:
options.c
Log Message:
The various include/exclude options are not used on the server side,
so if someone is trying something funny, just quit.
12 matches
Mail list logo
