On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> I went ahead and checked the change into CVS.
Ace, thanks. I wish all bugs were this easy to resolve :-)
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/
BERWICK ON TWEED TO WHITBY: WEST OR SOUTHWEST 2 OR 3 INCREASING 3 OR 4. FAIR.
GOOD. SL
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 03:27:56PM -0400, Paul Green wrote:
> Can we make up a test case that the build farm can execute?
Sure. I added something to the rsync test suite.
> I know of no issues from the POSIX standard that would prevent
> applying this mod.
Yeah. I'm probably just being overly
Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:12:16PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> > This is because of race conditions in finish_transfer() which mean
> > that it does not update files atomically.
>
> There is a diff in the "patches" dir named early-chmod.diff
> that changes
> this behavior.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:12:16PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> This is because of race conditions in finish_transfer() which mean
> that it does not update files atomically.
There is a diff in the "patches" dir named early-chmod.diff that changes
this behavior. It sets the permissions prior to the
We're using rsync to update the tables on our email relays, and very
occasionally we get an error in the logs saying that a table has the wrong
permissions. This is because of race conditions in finish_transfer() which
mean that it does not update files atomically. This makes rsync not
entirely saf
