https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
Summary: test bug, please ignore
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1618
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1618
Summary: rsync transfer messages
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: PA-RISC
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1613
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1613
Summary: fauilure with 2.6.2 installed
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: PA-RISC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1616
Summary: fauilure with 2.6.2 installed
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: PA-RISC
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1614
Summary: fauilure with 2.6.2 installed
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: PA-RISC
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1613
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-17 09:39 ---
*** Bug 1616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1613
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-17 09:38 ---
*** Bug 1615 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615
Summary: fauilure with 2.6.2 installed
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: PA-RISC
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1611
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1611
Summary: rsync cannot find a library
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1605
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1605
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 22:21 ---
Yep, adding iocharset=iso8859-1 as a mount option for the VFAT filesystem cures
the problem. It's a 2.6.5 kernel bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1605
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 22:05 ---
The problem might be related to capitalization of the file path. The files named
in the error messages are indeed being copied (at least some of them -- haven't
checked
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1605
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 22:14 ---
This may be a kernel 2.6.5 issue:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=mount+vfat+case&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=20eL6-4Sl-5%40gated-at.bofh.it&rnum=2
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1605
Summary: Copy from NTFS to VFAT produces mkstemp and stat errors
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1605
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-11 21:55 ---
I also get plenty of "stat" errors like this:
stat "/mnt/backup/lisa/g/Work/PC/DataAnal/AttS94/Old analyses/CONFLICT.HLM"
failed: No such file or directory
--
Configu
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1599
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1599
Summary: copy-unsafe-links cann't take affect
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1597
Summary: filter module list by access rights
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1582
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-06 07:34 ---
Thank you very much for your help.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
Yes, I'm working on a proper AppleDouble format next.
It requires a combination of the two file handling procedures I've
added so far, which either: a) send a file under a newly composed
filename, or b) synthesize a "faux file" from filesystem metadata,
and send that under a composed filename, bu
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, D Andrew Reynhout wrote:
> Several months ago, I posted my first pass at a patch to transfer
> Mac OS X HFS+ metadata (resource forks and Finder metadata) to
> non-HFS+ filesystems (Linux, Solaris, etc).
>
> I finally got a chance to update the patch to reflect suggestions
> of
Hi,
>> So, if you want to encrypt the traffic to an existing rsync daemon,
you'll need to use ssh (or maybe stunnel) to forward a local socket
address to the remote machine (which allows you to tell rsync to connect
to the local machine and have that connection get forwarded to the
remote machine
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:15:41PM +0200, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> The warning tells me that it's not possibel to use ssh?!
Not to connect with an existing rsync daemon. The remote-shell option
tells rsync to spawn a remote-shell which runs a program (rsync).
However, to connect to an existing
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 02:52, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:55:52AM +1000, Polyanovskyi, Sasha wrote:
> > * on some of the destination machines not just one rsync daemon, but
> > two rsync.exe processes become running (even though only one of several
> > parallel rsync processe
Widyono wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:15:41PM +0200, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
The warning tells me that it's not possibel to use ssh?!
I do this:
rsync -auz --delete --rsh=?ssh -l ssh_username"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]::www /var/www
WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsync daemon
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:15:41PM +0200, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> The warning tells me that it's not possibel to use ssh?!
>
> I do this:
> rsync -auz --delete --rsh=?ssh -l ssh_username"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]::www /var/www
>
> WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsync daemon
Hi list
I need to use rsync with ssh, but I keep getting this error message no
matter what I do, I've read the mailing lists but can't figure out what
needs to be done:
The warning tells me that it's not possibel to use ssh?!
I do this:
rsync -auz --delete --rsh=”ssh -l ssh_username"
[EMAIL PRO
On Mon 16 Aug 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I announced the release of 2.6.3pre1 on the rsync-announce mailing list
> back on the 12th. I was thinking at the time that this email would get
> seen by those on the regular rsync list, but I forgot that this is not
> how the rsync lists are setup. Fo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:55:52AM +1000, Polyanovskyi, Sasha wrote:
> * on some of the destination machines not just one rsync daemon, but
> two rsync.exe processes become running (even though only one of several
> parallel rsync processes from the source machine deals with such a
> destinatio
34 matches
Mail list logo
