Re: feedback on rsync-HEAD-20050125-1221GMT

Hi Chris, Chris Shoemaker wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:42:25PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote: Chris Shoemaker wrote: If I understand Wayne's design, it would be possible to invent a (per-directory) "hook" rule, whose value is executed, and whose stdout is parsed as a [in|ex]clude file list.

[patch] add "--ignore" option

Hi, The patch below adds a "--ignore" option to rsync, which means "--exclude-but-dont-delete-even-if-we-specified--delete-excluded". I need this for a few tasks, the simplest of which is to have rsync resist trying to delete NetApp filers' ".snapshot" directories. The change is fairly simple (t

--delete problem in 2.6.3 ?

Hi, Is there some problem with --delete option in rsync 2.6.3 ? I use: # rsync -v --force --delete * MYIP::MyModule/dir When I delete some file from origin machine, don't delete in destination. I tried to use a lot of parameters, but don't work :-(( Any help ? Thanks

Re: --delete problem in 2.6.3 ?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:51:40PM -0200, Sergio Cantarelli II wrote: > # rsync -v --force --delete * MYIP::MyModule/dir Change the '*' to a '.' so that rsync is told to send the current directory and not individual files. Then deletion will happen as expected. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or ch

BIG delete list makes for BIGGER RAM requirements

So I'm doing daily backups with rsync, and weekly, I run it with --delete after archiving the whole thing (this way I don't lose any deleted files). All week long this runs fine, but when I add --delete, rsync runs for a few hours then aborts because the box runs out of memory. Jan 30 06:31:09 bac

Re: [patch] add "--ignore" option

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:19:34PM -, Kirkwood, Matthew wrote: > The patch below adds a "--ignore" option to rsync, which means > "--exclude-but-dont-delete-even-if-we-specified--delete-excluded". Firstly, let me compliment you on the patch -- it was very complete. (Aside: it helps to attach

Re: BIG delete list makes for BIGGER RAM requirements

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Clint Byrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I'm doing daily backups with rsync, and weekly, I run it with > --delete after archiving the whole thing (this way I don't lose any > deleted files). All week long this runs fine, but when I add --delete, > rsync runs for a few hour

Re: feedback on rsync-HEAD-20050125-1221GMT

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:04:32AM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote: > > I agree that exclude/include patters can be tricky, and you have a good > point about familiarity versus complexity. I think what makes them hard > to handle is the fact that we are dealing with filename (and directory > na

Re: rsync-ing on MacOS X.

On Jan 29, 2005, at 09:52, Andrea Riciputi wrote: I'm setting up a backup script for my Mac, and I'm wondering about the rsync ability of dealing with HFS+ filesystem (resource-fork and such...). I've searched the mailing list archive for this topic and I've found some thread regarding it, but i

Re: BIG delete list makes for BIGGER RAM requirements

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:35:44PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote: > Wayne - it appears that the monolithic target file list is no longer > built for --delete or --delete-after as well. Is that true? No, at least not yet. Both the before and after file-deletion options use their old algorithms. Ho