[Bug 2408] when more than --max-delete files are about to be deleted no error is returned

2005-03-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-07 01:17 --- Thanks. If it is important enough for us, I may consider writing a patch. Maybe it is a good idea to document this in the manual page. Maybe something like:

Rsync write behaviour / efficiency

2005-03-07 Thread andy
Rsync is efficient at transferring diffs across the wire, but how efficient is it at updating the remote file itself (in terms of disk operations)? If, for example, you have a 500MB file (say an ISO) whose modification consists solely of a few bytes added on to the beginning of the file. Will it

Re: Rsync write behaviour / efficiency

2005-03-07 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 07 Mar 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If, for example, you have a 500MB file (say an ISO) whose modification consists solely of a few bytes added on to the beginning of the file. Will it create an entirely new 500MB file? Or will it somehow know how to insert the bytes at the

[Bug 2423] New: Feature Request: Ability to transfer files newer than date or file. (--newer switch).

2005-03-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2423 Summary: Feature Request: Ability to transfer files newer than date or file. (--newer switch). Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status:

Re: Rsync write behaviour / efficiency

2005-03-07 Thread andy
Paul Slootman wrote: Inserting bytes at the beginning of a file can't be done, at least not on unix-like systems. That can only be done by copying the file. Ok. What about if there were some inserts in the middle of the hypothetical 500MB file, starting for example at the 450 millionth up to

Strangeness with rsync

2005-03-07 Thread Collins, Kevin
Hi all! I've got a machine setup to be an RSYNC Server, i.e. running rsync in daemon mode waiting for connections from various other machines on my network. This machine is running Debian Sarge and rsync 2.6.3. For the past several days, I've been getting notices like this in my backup logs:

rsync as a change-detecting security tool

2005-03-07 Thread Keith Lofstrom
I suspect rsync actually *cannot* be used as a change detection tool for security purposes, but I want some help with my reasoning. Imagine a backup system that uses rsync to move files from client to a trusted server. The backup system operates in pull mode, and the backup server uses rsync

RE: Strangeness with rsync

2005-03-07 Thread Clay Goss
Like Keven, I am getting the same file has vanished: some randomly chosen blady-bla file name (w/ or w/o the in backup) message. However, unlike Keven, sometimes the file is in the destination, and sometimes it isn't. My setup is: Source: Window XP Pro via a mounted Window's

Getting a list of transferred/deleted items

2005-03-07 Thread Christoph Biedl
Hello, As far as I can see there's no option to get a list of files/directories/ whatever that have been transferred. This is not exactly the same as the --verbose output for two reasons: At first the -v output has been sanitized to avoid terminal confusion, second this might be hard to parse