I received the following bug report for the Debian rsync package today.
I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in this
way...
Perhaps Wayne could comment?
Paul Slootman
On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
Rsync fails to push filters to the the remote host
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2647
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-26 06:27 ---
That is an interesting suggestion and one I dismissed out of hand. However, it
is possible and I will evaluate that possibility. Thank you. I have removed
the single
Scott wrote:
Perhaps an rsync 'job' file could be used instead of everything coming
from command line switches and separate file lists. Kind of like
rsyncd.conf but not for server mode. A typical config style
layout where
multiline include and exclude list can be placed along with all other
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:25:14AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in
this way...
It shouldn't, and (interestingly) it wouldn't have if --delete had been
specified (apparently I did all my backward-compatibility testing using
Eli wrote:
Scott wrote:
Perhaps an rsync 'job' file could be used instead of everything coming
from command line switches and separate file lists. Kind of like
rsyncd.conf but not for server mode. A typical config style
layout where
multiline include and exclude list can be placed along with
On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:25:14AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in
this way...
It shouldn't, and (interestingly) it wouldn't have if --delete had been
specified (apparently I did all
Scott wrote:
If it supported a job file then I would probably use it. It
would make
setting up and maintaining
cron triggered syncs a little eaiser to maintain and keep
organized. I
think that what you want might
also be easier to independantly implement with job file support.
Well I
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2647
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-26 12:55 ---
Hrm. Well, that suggestion didn't appear to work. The command that was run now
was:
/usr/bin/rsync -v --progress --delete --stats --exclude=/proc/ --exclude=/sys/
What do this uid =0 anfd gid = 0 mean? Can it pose any security issues.
Thanks,
VC
[root]
path = /
auth users = XXX
secrets file = /usr/local/etc/rsyncd.secrets
uid = 0
gid = 0
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of
root access (root by any name is UID 0)
can read and write anything anywhere
You might add stuff like
list = false
read only = true
depending on what access you need
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
VC123
Sent: Tuesday,
Thnaks for yr reply.How can I restrict the client to not be able to
upload any file or write any file if rsyncd.conf contains uid=0 and
gid=0 ?
Thanks,
VC
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root access (root by any name is UID 0)
can read and write anything anywhere
You might add stuff like
[root]
is one of several.
Simplest and easiest is to have several of them
each able to do (only) what it needs to do.
Limits the damage due to fumblefingers, probably the greatest real threat.
If all of the stuff belongs to one user,
then UID = user GID = user prevents a lot of problems.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2654
Summary: timeout is always triggered with 2.6.4
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Need I remind you that the source code
is freely-available? Implement the algorithm in perl, use that as
a module, and build others around it. The world needs more heroes.
73,
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services - ODCS
desk:3039240938
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Greetings,
My name is Jim Kennedy, and I am writing you this email from my home
here in Staten Island, NY.
The reason for this email is that you and I share something in common...
At some point in our lives we contemplated or tried to start a home
business. Don't worry; I'm not trying
to sell
Date: Tue Apr 26 15:24:40 2005
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19528
Modified Files:
exclude.c
Log Message:
Fixed problem with -C when we're the sender, the remote is using an
older protocol, and we're not sending the exclude list (i.e.
Date: Tue Apr 26 15:25:43 2005
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21844
Modified Files:
NEWS
Log Message:
Mention newest fix.
Revisions:
NEWS1.285 = 1.286
Date: Tue Apr 26 16:09:03 2005
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2116
Modified Files:
exclude.c
Log Message:
A slightly better fix than the last one (though it won't make any
difference in how the code behaves due to how it is called).
Date: Tue Apr 26 16:25:01 2005
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync/testsuite
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7328
Modified Files:
hardlinks.test
Log Message:
Added a new test to check how we interact with --link-dest and
--copy-dest.
Revisions:
hardlinks.test
19 matches
Mail list logo
