Hard links revisited

2005-06-07 Thread Scott Lovenberg
I can't seem to get the hardlinks to work in windows via --link-dest. It just refuses to find the files in the directory and make a hard link. Here's the setup. -I run 2 rsyncs from batch files called sync.bat and sync2.bat. -I'm connected to the server via a mapped network drive, we'll call

@ERROR: auth failed on module

2005-06-07 Thread twsnnva
Hi, My nightly rsync jobs recently began to fail. I don't recall making any modifications to the rsync config files or upgrading rsync. Below is the error I receive when I try to rsync the home directory of serverA to serverB. Is there anything obviously wrong? Thanks. serverA rsync # rsync

Re: @ERROR: auth failed on module

2005-06-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:07:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2005/06/07 11:29:35 [20870] auth failed on module home from serverA.domain.com (192.168.1.3) If you upgrade the server to 2.6.5, rsync will log the reason that the auth failed on that log-file line (password mismatch, missing

Re: Hard links revisited

2005-06-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:51:19AM -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote: #sync2.bat second backup - should use hardlinks c:\program files\cwrsync\rsync.exe -avr --stats --link-dest=/cygdrive/c/source /cygdrive/z/Users/Scott's Folder/testBackup/ destination::testHardLinks For that to work the

[Bug 2758] File exists error using options -b and --backup-dir with device files.

2005-06-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional

[Bug 2758] File exists error using options -b and --backup-dir with device files.

2005-06-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-07 10:56 --- Created an attachment (id=1264) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1264action=view) A partial fix My version of the quick-fix that only deals with

Re: @ERROR: auth failed on module

2005-06-07 Thread John Van Essen
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the detail in your report. Error messages, log messages, config files all in one email. :) /var/log/rsyncd.log on ServerB 2005/06/07 11:29:24 [22075] rsyncd version 2.6.0 starting, listening on port 873 2005/06/07 11:29:35 [20870]

Re: AIX rsync backup problem -- cp with hard link fails

2005-06-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:34:45PM -0400, Sherry Sun wrote: Cannot link to a file on another device. How should I get around this problem? Your only choices are to turn off -H (so that rsync copies hard-linked files as separate files) or to ensure that all dirs containing files that are

Cannot Allocate Memory

2005-06-07 Thread Max Kipness
Hello - I've just upgraded to 2.6.5. On a new set of servers I'm trying to sync I seem to be running into a log of memory allocation errors. With some of the servers, I start the rsync session, and it counts so many files and then stops. At that point I'm unable to control-c out of the process.

Re: How to --exclude /usr/ but --include /usr/local/ ?

2005-06-07 Thread Larry Alkoff
Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:28:08PM -0500, Larry Alkoff wrote: In looking at man rsync, it does not appear to both --exclude /usr/ and --include /usr/local/ Correct, you can't exclude /usr and still get to /usr/local. What you want to do is to include /usr/local/ and

Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Moshe Jacobson
Hi rsync folks, I understand that by default, rsync will re-copy a file if the timestamp differs, but the size is the same. Sometimes, though, I have large files whose mtime have been changed but are otherwise identical. It seems a solution to this is --checksum, but it seems like --checksum

Re: Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:46:43PM -0400, Moshe Jacobson wrote: Is this something that would be hard to implement? Yes, it would be rather awkward in the current protocol. The way things currently work, the receiving side needs to have all relevant info already available in order to decide what

Re: Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Moshe Jacobson
Thanks for the prompt reply, Wayne. I just did a test and found that --partial will prevent rsync from transferring the entire file again when the mtimes vary but the sizes are the same. I suppose this is sufficient, but how does it determine that the files are the same if it's not doing a

Re: @ERROR: auth failed on module

2005-06-07 Thread Thomas Simmons
John Wayne, :) I'm fairly certain no other rsync processes were running, a reboot was part of the troubleshooting process, as was a 'killall rsync' or two. I did try specifying the user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]::home), and manually gave the password. I did not have the newline character at the end

BUG REPORT: latest rsync misinvokes ssh with [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...

2005-06-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
The latest rsync (2.6.5) seems to invoke the transport specified by $RSYNC_RSH differently. I have this set to point at an ssh wrapper script (which is now I noticed), and an strace shows this: [archives/[EMAIL PROTECTED] strace -e trace=process -f /opt/bin/rsync -avHP