Re: rsync to a Samba/CIFS filessytem hangs

On Fri 15 Jul 2005, Robert Gasch wrote: The output from strace and lsof would be helpful. However, my impression is that the CIFS filesystem is deadlocking somewhere... [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# lsof -p 16327 COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICESIZENODE NAME rsync 16327

Re: DotNet Version Of Rsync

R-type Studios [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Hi People, Just wondering if anyone has ported rsync to dotnet yet? Thanks Alex Err why? Isn't the current Windows commandline version good enough? Or am I missing something? :-) -- Stuart Halliday ECS Technology ltd Registered in Scotland -

change in backup behavior from 2.5 to 2.6

In rsync 2.5, using the --backup and --backup-dir switches without a --suffix would copy backed up files to the backup dir with no extension. In 2.6, you must use a blank suffix (suffix=) in order to get the same behavior. This means that 2.5 clients are unable to backup to the server without

Re: change in backup behavior from 2.5 to 2.6

On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 12:15:41PM -0600, Larry Bernstone wrote: In rsync 2.5, using the --backup and --backup-dir switches without a --suffix would copy backed up files to the backup dir with no extension. This is true in all versions of rsync (that I know of), including all 2.6.x versions.

[Bug 2873] Including username and hostname in both source and dest fails

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

backups

Sorry. Went back to source and it does work properly. My binaries have been tinkered with -- The information contained in this electronic communication and any document attached hereto or transmitted herewith is confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity

Re: DotNet Version Of Rsync

Stuart Halliday wrote: R-type Studios [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Hi People, Just wondering if anyone has ported rsync to dotnet yet? Thanks Alex Err why? Isn't the current Windows commandline version good enough? Or am I missing something? :-) A certain lack of reliability on

[Bug 2873] Including username and hostname in both source and dest fails

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 12:01 --- Created an attachment (id=1314) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1314action=view) Reject both source and destination specifying a host Here's a patch

[Bug 2758] File exists error using options -b and --backup-dir with device files.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2871] rsync fails on chown command.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2881] New: delete-exclude

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 Summary: delete-exclude Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core

Virus incident

Panda Antivirus has found a virus in: File: Name: [letter.zip][letter.zip][letter.txt .scr] MIME type: application/octet-stream Malware found: W32/Mydoom.N.worm Action carried

[Bug 2873] Including username and hostname in both source and dest fails

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 14:07 --- I had meant to include some suggestions for remote-to-remote copying but forgot. Let's remedy that. Let's say you wish to be able to run rsync -av host1:file host2:

[Bug 2881] delete-exclude

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

CVS update: rsync

Date: Fri Jul 15 19:10:03 2005 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7933 Modified Files: main.c Log Message: Avoid newest test when no destination was specified. Revisions: main.c 1.274 = 1.275