hi all!
I tried to synchronise a directory with the following command:
rsync -avz --exclude "db/" /source/ /destination/folder/ --delete
The source has 3 subfolders one of them is not necessary for to synchronize so i
exluded this folder.
everything works fine and fast :) excludes were made...an
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:19:08PM +0100, Nick Burrett wrote:
The attached patch provides an additional check for the checksumming
mode to ensure that a file that is actually written out to disk can be
read back and has the same MD4 sum as the file on at the originating
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> hi all!
>
> I tried to synchronise a directory with the following command:
>
> rsync -avz --exclude "db/" /source/ /destination/folder/ --delete
>
> The source has 3 subfolders one of them is not necessary for to synchronize
Zitat von Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> > hi all!
> >
> > I tried to synchronise a directory with the following command:
> >
> > rsync -avz --exclude "db/" /source/ /destination/folder/ --delete
> >
> > The source has
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:26:39PM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> Zitat von Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> > > hi all!
> > >
> > > I tried to synchronise a directory with the following command:
> > >
> > > rsyn
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:05:17AM +0100, Nick Burrett wrote:
> The attached patch incorporates your suggestions, and calls the option
> '--read-verify'.
Note that your suggested option does not need to affect the --checksum
code in any way -- that code sends pre-transfer checksums to determine
if
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> But mostly rsync copies always the same files of a certain folder
> again to the destination folder...although REALLY no changes were made
> to the files!?
Which most likely means that something is touching the files. If you'r
Hi,
My situation is that I would like to use rsync to copy very large files
within my network/systems. Specifically, these files are
in the order of 10-100GB. Needless to say, I would like to be able
to restart a transfer if it only partially succeeded, but NOT repeat
the work already done.
Cur
Woops! In my last email, I meant to say the second command
was:
rsync --no-whole-file --progress theFile /path/to/dest
Todd
Hi,
My situation is that I would like to use rsync to copy very large files
within my network/systems. Specifically, these files are
in the order of 10-100GB. Needless
On 7/26/05, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:44:00PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> > I am frequently facing problem with rsync as it hangs with no
> > messages.
>
> It has been my experience that this is caused by bugs in cygwin's pipe
> handling -- if you r
On 7/27/05, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:04:22PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> > Now to avoid adding another manual step to my setup process (such as
> > manually configuring inetd.conf and rsyncd.conf), I was looking at the
> > options to start rsync vi
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:59:44PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> I was under the impression that "--daemon --rsh" functionality is
> meant to simplify the above
Firstly, that syntax is wrong: it's --rsh=ssh combined with a deamon
source/destination (host::module), and yes it does simplify thin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Todd Papaioannou wrote:
> where both theFile and /path/to/dest are local drives. [...]
> rsync -u --no-whole-file --progress theFile /path/to/dest
When using local drives, the rsync protocol (--no-whole-file) slows
things down, so you don't want to use it
Wayne,
Thanks for the swift answers and insight.
> > However, the stats shown during the progress seem to imply that the
> > whole transfer is starting again.
>
> Yes, that's what rsync does. It retransfers the whole file, but it
> uses the local data to make the amount of data flowing over
On 7/27/05, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:59:44PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> > I was under the impression that "--daemon --rsh" functionality is
> > meant to simplify the above
>
> Firstly, that syntax is wrong: it's --rsh=ssh combined with a deamon
>
Hey,
I'm currently adding rsync to pacman (http://archlinux.org/pacman). A static
version of the program is used for rescue operations. Because of this it
is impossible to use the rsync client programm via an execve call and we
need a version implemented in C.
So I started implementing it. But th
Zitat von Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Which most likely means that something is touching the files. If you're
using 2.6.5, add the -i option to see what attributes have changed to
trigger the copy.
..wayne..
hi
ok when I use the -i flag then I get the following output:
building fil
17 matches
Mail list logo
