Hi,
There is an area I would like to rsync with remote site. Is
there a problem reading/writing to that area during the time rsync is in
progress?
Thanks,
Oren Mark
Intel - Israel
Engineering Computing
Unix Server Platforms
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(+) 972-4-865-5987
iNET: 465-5987
Hi,
I'm a little confused over what I'm seeing when a source file is
overwritten whilst an rsync is in progress. Instead of the destination
file being truncated, or an error being raised and the destination file
removed, I get a file of the correct length, but mostly full of nulls
where previously
Hi rsync developers,
I'm trying to get some fancy mirroring done with selecting files from a
larger archive through the --files-from option. The only problem that I
do see is that rsync will not eat the --delete option whatever I try.
Thus, all the old files remain in the mirror archive instead of
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 11:56 MST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> In fact, would anyone object if the non-root meaning of -a changed
> to behavior #3?
Yes -- I would. I do a lot of copying where I want the perm
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:42:20PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> To be more clearly, I want the rsync --files-from option to behave like
> "take these files out of $TARGET and *ONLY* these files", i.e. deleting
> *EVERYTHING* there is except the files given in the index file added to
> --files-from
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:43:42PM +, Jon Mitchell wrote:
> Instead of the destination file being truncated, or an error being
> raised and the destination file removed, I get a file of the correct
> length, but mostly full of nulls where previously there were none.
This is something that has
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:05:51PM +0200, Mark, Oren wrote:
> There is an area I would like to rsync with remote site. Is there a
> problem reading/writing to that area during the time rsync is in
> progress?
Rsync should handle changes fairly well, but it is not perfect. If the
currently-active
Hi all!
We're using cwrsync server 2.0.4 on winxp to keep files up to date between
some operator machines.
Whenever I run rsync to send files to another machine, the read-only flag
gets set. The cwrsync user was created (the install is completely
standard)... so I'm thinking it might have someth
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 11:33 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> + /foo/
> + /foo/bar/
> + /foo/bar/baz
> + /foo/extra
> + /bar/
> + /bar/another
> - /foo/*
> - /foo/bar/*
> - /bar/*
> - /*
Am I missing something? Once you've matched each file and directory you
want explicitly, can't you just exclude ev
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 14:36 MST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Yes -- I would. I do a lot of copying where I want the permissions and groups
> copied exactly from the source.
If you care about the permissions
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:28:19PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Once you've matched each file and directory you want explicitly, can't
> you just exclude everything else
You can't if one of the items specified is a directory whose contents
you want to send. Otherwise you can. (Aside "- **" is
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 15:12 MST ---
This is not really the place to hold a tangent conversatation, but no, I don't
want behavior #2, as I'm not running as root (but I do have multiple groups
associated with my
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465
Summary: --files-from does not --delete
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: AIX
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: cor
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|NEW
Hi Erik,
Since cwrsync contains some windows-specific arrangements not directly related
to rsync itself, I've
established a cwrsync discussion forum half a year ago. It is available at
http://www.itefix.no/phpws/index.php?module=phpwsbb&PHPWSBB_MAN_OP=viewforum&PHPWS_MAN_ITEMS=1
. You
may consi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 16:31 MST ---
I'm sorry for abusing your Bugzilla. Let the discussion continue on the
mailing list if necessary. Never mind changing the behavior of -a, but an
official alias for -rltE -
Wayne Davison wrote:
> > There is an area I would like to rsync with remote site. Is there a
> > problem reading/writing to that area during the time rsync is in
> > progress?
>
> Rsync should handle changes fairly well, but it is not perfect. If the
> currently-active file is changed while it is
> But this won't work if the change that occurred on the sending side
> after the transfer started happens within the same second, and the
> mtimes have only one second resolution, will it?
>
> That's quite likely, if the file is reasonably small and the first
> rsync managed to send a mixture of
18 matches
Mail list logo
