On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:49 -0500, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Jamie Lokier on 2006/02/09 at 18:55 +]
>
> >I think the hyphen is out of place; it looks very wrong to my eye, but
> >I'm not a grammarian so don't have a fine explanation.
>
> You're quite right ... "read in" should be
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> --- rsync-2.6.7pre1.orig/rsync.yo
> +++ rsync-2.6.7pre1/rsync.yo
> @@ -1014,7 +1018,7 @@
> as it is sent to the destination machine, which reduces the amount of data
> being transmitted -- something that is useful over a slow connec
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 06:11:01PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> However, the ACL patch tried to patch autom4te.cache files
Oops! That was a weird side-effect of my adding extra features to my
release script (which now makes use of the improved verify-patches
script). Thanks for pointing that o
I'm trying out rsync 2.6.7pre1. Since the distributed patches now patch
generated files, I thought I could simply extract, apply the ACL patch,
configure, and make. However, the ACL patch tried to patch
autom4te.cache files I didn't have because I didn't autoconf myself.
I'm guessing this is an u
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 21:30 +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Does rsync support acl and xattr (as with acl and user_xattr mount options)?
>
> I saw some acl patches for rsync, so probably it's not officially
> blessed yet.
>
> However, I didn't see any xattr patches - although some talks about
Does rsync support acl and xattr (as with acl and user_xattr mount options)?
I saw some acl patches for rsync, so probably it's not officially
blessed yet.
However, I didn't see any xattr patches - although some talks about it
on the list go back into year 2003.
So how it is with support f
[quoted lines by Jamie Lokier on 2006/02/09 at 18:55 +]
>I think the hyphen is out of place; it looks very wrong to my eye, but
>I'm not a grammarian so don't have a fine explanation.
You're quite right ... "read in" should be two separate words as there should
not be a hyphen between a verb
Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > compare inode and device number. When those are the same, the two files
> > must be hardlinked.
>
> Also, rsync only considers files that have a link count larger than 1
> (see stat()'s st_nlink) since this a
Wayne Davison wrote:
> > - (below) in order to have the rules that are read-in from the file
> > + (below) in order to have the rules that are read in from the file
>
> I consider the original a good use of hyphenation to help distinguish
> the phrase "are read-in from a file" (using the past-
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Is the --ipv4, --ipv6 description twice in the manpage?
Yes, once in the section on client options, and once in the section on
daemon options.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/
Is the --ipv4, --ipv6 description twice in the manpage?
The description is quite different, so I'm wondering whether it should
be in a different context :-)
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> compare inode and device number. When those are the same, the two files
> must be hardlinked.
Also, rsync only considers files that have a link count larger than 1
(see stat()'s st_nlink) since this allows it to ignore the vast major
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> -Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios that can
> +Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios than can
I also note that the first "this" should be "that".
> -options that rsync mi
On Thu 09 Feb 2006, Matthias Blohm wrote:
> We are having problems with a very high load at the time of an rsync is
> running.
> Sometimes if 2 or 3 Rsyncs are running simultanously on to the same machine
> the load goes up on that machine to 10 or more. the datas will be synced in
> about 2 or
On Wed 08 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please
> give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list with any
> questions, comments, bug reports, etc.
A couple of text improvements / typos that were sent to me...
Paul Slootma
On Thu 09 Feb 2006, yogesh kulkarni wrote:
>Am presently working on rsync and would like to know
>how does rsync identify hardlinks.I have gone through
>the hlink.c file and have not really understood the
>flow presented in the function.If anyone can provide
>
Hi,
Specs: rsync is running as root with prio: 0
Linux: Debian Kernel: 2.4.30
Rsync: rsync version 2.6.4 protocol version 29
We are having problems with a very high load at the time of an rsync is running.
Sometimes if 2 or 3 Rsyncs are running simultanously on to the same machine the load goe
hi, Am presently working on rsync and would like to know how does rsync identify hardlinks.I have gone through the hlink.c file and have not really understood the flow presented in the function.If anyone can provide some more info on this please inform me.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:10:30AM -0500, Dave Mielke wrote:
> >The itemized output now uses 'S' for a special file instead of
> >clumping them together with the 'D' for devices.
>
> Is this a Windows thing?
Nope. On Posix systems, you need root privileges to create devices
(character or block)
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:35:11PM +1100, Craig Hammond wrote:
> I have a particular directory in my exclude list, but I want it
> excluded from --delete-excluded.
Sure, that's easy enough using filter rules. Just add a protect filter
rule to what you have now and rsync will protect any matching
hello matt,
thank you for your reply.
as is see, the method you describe is just "theoretical", because it won`t work
due to buffering issue.
furthermore, it still needs ssh or maybe another remote shell.
i'd like to leave out ssh or probably any remote shell entirely because
encryption is sl
21 matches
Mail list logo
