On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:59:54PM -0400, Bob Bagwill wrote:
> You probably already considered this, but you could also do something
> like this: [...]
That divides the entire file-list up into 50-file chunks, whereas I
believe that the original poster wanted to allow 50 differing files to
be upda
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:53:30 -0400, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Adrian Cooke wrote:
Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files
at one time?
No, that is not something that rsync supports. It would be fairly easy
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:01:22PM +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> AFAIR, this escaping was intended only for filenames, right?
It affects all messages these days because filenames can occur embedded
in all sorts of messages and only the client side can determine which
multi-byte sequences are va
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Adrian Cooke wrote:
> Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files
> at one time?
No, that is not something that rsync supports. It would be fairly easy
to add such a check into the generator.c code, but I'm not presently
inclined
Dear Customer,
Our Technical Service
department has recently updated our online banking
software, and due to this
upgrade we kindly ask you to follow the
link given below to confirm your online account details.
Failure to
confirm the online banking
details wi
Hi all,
For some time I noticed that my rsync server is not showing a colorfull MOTD...
Researching a bit, it turns out to be a problem since rsync-2.6.7 (rsync-2.6.6
is OK).
Looking at the NEWS:
- The way rsync escapes unreadable characters has changed. First, rsync
now has support
Hey,
Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files at
one time. I want to do this to make the initial set up time of the
filelist before transfer to be reasonably predictable.
Rsync is basically going to transfer from one mailbox to another mailbox
but I want to be abl
