Re: Is it okay to rsync the same source to the same dest multipletimes?

> If you can segment the list, or at least use some disjoint excludes so > that the processes get out of lockstep with each other, you'll be better > off. Thanks, that's what I've been trying to do so far. > If you are limited by CPU when running multiple rsyncs, you may need to > turn off compre

Re: Is it okay to rsync the same source to the same dest multiple times?

On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:17:18PM +, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Is it okay to run multiple rsyncs copying the same source to the same > destination or do I have to take care that they work on disjoint > sections of the source directory tree? If you run the same command multiple times, you risk h

Re: rsync error: error starting client-server protocol

On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:12:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > @ERROR: access denied to home from localhost (127.0.0.1) This is the important bit. This means that you got through to the rsync daemon and it rejected your access. The log file for the daemon will have more explicit informatio

RE: rsync error: error starting client-server protocol

> -Original Message- > From: Wayne Davison > Subject: Re: rsync error: error starting client-server protocol > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:02:02PM +0100, you wrote: > > I get now the error you can read in the subject. Any hint to get it > > run again would be fine. > > Please be more ex

Is it okay to rsync the same source to the same dest multiple times?

I'm doing a huge rsync from one net to another (about a terabyte) over a dedicated DS-3. One rsync doesn't even come close to saturating the line, especially with compression enabled. Is it okay to run multiple rsyncs copying the same source to the same destination or do I have to take care that

Re: Which rsync is considered modern?

On Wed 08 Nov 2006, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: > > Manpage states the following: > > For remote transfers, a modern rsync uses ssh for its communications > > > Indeed I see rsync invoking ssh, yet I wonder what is considered "modern"? The default changed from rsh to ssh in 2.6.0. Paul Slootm

Which rsync is considered modern?

I'm using this rsync: # rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 Manpage states the following: For remote transfers, a modern rsync uses ssh for its communications Indeed I see rsync invoking ssh, yet I wonder what is considered "modern"? 10x, Amit -- To unsubscribe or c