Re: --chmod for destination only

2009-02-06 Thread Matthew Monaco
What I'm concerned with is the fact that --chmod -p will create new copies of files in the destination rather than create links Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 09:32 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote: >> Is it possible to set the permissions on the destination side? As I >> understand it

Re: --chmod for destination only

2009-02-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
Matthew, please remember to CC rsync@lists.samba.org . On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 22:33 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote: > Matt McCutchen wrote: > > With --chmod and -p, the receiver will locally copy any --link-dest > > files that have the right data but the wrong permissions. This will > > give you the

Re: --chmod for destination only

2009-02-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 09:32 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote: > Is it possible to set the permissions on the destination side? As I > understand it, --chmod just pretends certain permissions are coming from > the sending side. If you use --chmod with -p, you'll end up setting the destination permissio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6095] New: code 23 when files or directories disappear, instead of code 24.

2009-02-06 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6095 Summary: code 23 when files or directories disappear, instead of code 24. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

--chmod for destination only

2009-02-06 Thread Matthew Monaco
Is it possible to set the permissions on the destination side? As I understand it, --chmod just pretends certain permissions are coming from the sending side. I'd like to be able to set permissions to readonly in the destination while coming from a --copy/link-dest which may more may not have had