Re: cryptic output with itemized option

2009-04-02 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 02 Apr 2009, Jignesh Shah wrote: > Could any one please tell me if there is any way to remove 11 letters long > cryptic output from -ii option. That "cryptic" output is the main point of --itemize-changes... And note that -ii is dedundant, -i is enough. I suspect you want to use --out-for

Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format

2009-04-02 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:50:13AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync > V2.6.* . Is there any way I can make this output similar to rsync V2.6.*? What difference are you referring to? The use of send instead of recv for a local t

RE: What could this be? Transfer error code 16

2009-04-02 Thread Boniforti Flavio
> This looks like an application is running where the backup is > to be made. The application opens and locks the files > with an exclusive lock and the rsync program must then wait > until it is freed by the application or times out. > > This is a typical problem under Windows. Can you ask th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?

2009-04-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 --- Comment #5 from m...@lbl.gov 2009-04-02 19:32 CST --- Is this something that could be added to the test suite? I notice that this behavior has come up and been fixed before, albeit with a different cause and solution. But since reg