Hello,
Like on any other mounting system, if you run rsync over a mounted ftp
volume, it won't be able to save you a lot of bandwidth with the delta
algorithm as it's not running on both sides of the link.
In another hand, if bandwidth is not your problem, with this method
rsync should (t
Hi,
It seems to work but very slowly. I guess it's because rsync has to read the
complete file content
on the remote host, so does it make any sense at all to do it over FTP?
-
--
Kent Tong
Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW
Axis2 tutorials freely available
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:45 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote:
>> Thanks everyone for your help, I've got what I want.
>>
>> My first attempt has been
>> --include="*/" --include="*.foo" --include="*.bar"
>> --include="/this_dir/***" --exclude="*"
>> which did nothing than *.foo a
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:45 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your help, I've got what I want.
>
> Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Thomas Gutzler
> > mailto:thomas.gutz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I thought --include="/this_dir/" --include="/this_d
Thanks everyone for your help, I've got what I want.
Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Thomas Gutzler
> mailto:thomas.gutz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I thought --include="/this_dir/" --include="/this_dir/***" would do it,
> but it doesn't. The exclude * seems to overw
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
> Given that this is a network transfer rate, it'd be more proper (and
> consistent with other applications) to change the function to work
> in SI kilobytes per second (i.e. use 1000 instead of 1024), but
> that's backwards-incompatible. If you'd like to go this route,
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881
--- Comment #1 from rlaa...@wiktel.com 2009-11-09 12:54 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=4934)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4934&action=view)
A patch to change the documentation to use "KiB/s" and "kibibytes per se
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881
Summary: --bwlimit option uses KiB/s, but is documented as (what
amounts to) kB/s
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Sev
Am Montag, 9. November 2009 17:48:35 schrieb Matt McCutchen:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:43 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > does anybody know what's the maximum file size (terabytes?) when using
> > rsync with options --checksum and / or --inplace?
> >
> > What file sizes have been tested in rea
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:43 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> does anybody know what's the maximum file size (terabytes?) when using rsync
> with options --checksum and / or --inplace?
>
> What file sizes have been tested in reality? Are there any experiences using
> rsync (with --checksum and /
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Thomas Gutzler wrote:
> I thought --include="/this_dir/" --include="/this_dir/***" would do it,
> but it doesn't. The exclude * seems to overwrite the include matches:
> [sender] hiding file this_dir/foo because of pattern *
>
Order is important. Whatever matche
Hello,
does anybody know what's the maximum file size (terabytes?) when using rsync
with options --checksum and / or --inplace?
What file sizes have been tested in reality? Are there any experiences using
rsync (with --checksum and / or --inplace) for big files with several / dozens
or terabyt
12 matches
Mail list logo