Re: Incremental recursion not working

On 24.03.2010 01:37, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:40 +0100, Gerald Holl wrote: I'm using rsync 3.0.3 over ssh to sync data between two hosts. I can't get the incremental recursion working: rsync -vLogtprz --progress --delete --delete-during --partial -e "ssh -p 1234" --numeric-

--delete question.

Please advise on rsync usage. --delete doesn’t work without recursion(--recursion). The recursion is causing huge overheads for me. My directory trees are huge. Any suggestions through which I can cut overheads. It used to work well in rsync-v2.5.5 /opt/rsync-v2.5.5/bin/rsync --delete --chec

Re: Incremental recursion not working

On Wed 24 Mar 2010, Gerald Holl wrote: > Maybe it's because of too many files? The file list consists of > approx. 450.000 items. Incremental recursion works per directory. If all those 450.000 files are in one directory, then incremental recursion won't help. The number of items isn't the probl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7057] Buffer overflow when sending a file with long name

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7057 jzel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5215 is|0 |1 obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] New: --link-dest seen as unknown option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7289 Summary: --link-dest seen as unknown option Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] --link-dest seen as unknown option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7289 --- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2010-03-24 11:40 CST --- (In reply to comment #0) > # rsync -az --list-dest=../dir1 dir_s/ dir_d > rsync: --list-dest=../dir1: unknown option You misspelled --link-dest. -- Configure bugmail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] --link-dest seen as unknown option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7289 --- Comment #2 from p...@lowell.edu 2010-03-24 11:41 CST --- never mind it should be link-dest (not list-dest) ::blushes:: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] --link-dest seen as unknown option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7289 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: --delete question.

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 12:10 +0530, Satish Shukla wrote: > Please advise on rsync usage. --delete doesn’t work without > recursion(--recursion). The recursion is causing huge overheads for > me. My directory trees are huge. Any suggestions through which I can > cut overheads. It used to work well

Re: UDT4 and rsync? support to socket.c?

Jamie Lokier kirjoitti: Jan Wagner wrote: Hi, has anyone of the devels considered adding UDT4 fast reliable udp transport to socket.c, as a user-selectable alternative to using default slow TCP? It could give a 4 to 10-fold throughput improvement to rsync speed over wide area networks.