On 11/14/2010 12:20 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI
Motohiro wrote:
Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg s
Hi,
as scanning large repositories for each client connection causes
unnecessary CPU/IO load, I want to know if is it possible to generate
checksum digest files on the server, meanwhile?
Best regards,
Renne
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubsc
